TY - JOUR
T1 - A decalogue of Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) recommendations from the CAN.HEAL Consortium
AU - Ciliberto, Gennaro
AU - De Maria, Ruggero
AU - Giacomini, Patrizio
AU - Trapani, Valentina
AU - Betti, Martina
AU - Bucci, Gabriele
AU - Buglioni, Simonetta
AU - D'Auria, Lucia
AU - De Angelis, Roberta
AU - De Nicolo, Arcangela
AU - Dupain, Celia
AU - Frederickx, Nancy
AU - Genuardi, Maurizio
AU - Indraccolo, Stefano
AU - Kolanowska, Monika
AU - Mazzarella, Luca
AU - Nowak, Frederique
AU - Pallocca, Matteo
AU - Scerri, Jeanesse
AU - Sgambato, Alessandro
AU - Stoklosa, Tomasz
AU - Van den Bulcke, Marc
AU - Van Valckenborgh, Els
AU - von Bubnoff, Nikolas
AU - Zeuli, Massimo
AU - Kamal, Maud
AU - Le Tourneau, Christophe
N1 - Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/6/3
Y1 - 2025/6/3
N2 - INTRODUCTION: The CAN.HEAL consortium, comprising 47 cancer centers and academic institutions across 17 EU countries, has developed a set of recommendations for Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs) to address the lack of standardized guidelines in personalized cancer medicine.METHODS: Over the past 2 years, through extensive collaboration and seven dedicated online meetings, CAN.HEAL experts developed consensus-based recommendations across 10 critical domains.RESULTS: The consortium agreed that MTBs' primary role is to perform molecular and clinical assessments for patients requiring care beyond standard treatment. Core MTB composition should include medical oncologists, molecular biologists, pathologists, and bioinformaticians. Patient eligibility criteria should prioritize performance status, with flexibility for rare cases. Shared informed consent is crucial for sample collection, data use, and research. A two-tiered IT workflow, with minimal and maximal datasets, is recommended, along with a comprehensive decision support tool. These recommendations focus on genomic testing, acknowledging diversity of NGS assays and proposing general guidelines. MTB reports should be concise, with technical details provided in the molecular diagnostic report. Innovative approaches like the Drug Rediscovery Protocol support access to off-label therapies. Harmonized training for MTB members is essential to bridging knowledge gaps in this evolving field. Indicators are needed to assess MTB effectiveness over time. Expanding MTB benefits to underserved populations depends on creating a shared European MTB database.CONCLUSION: Standardizing MTB practices represents a key step toward equitable access to personalized medicine and improved cancer care across Europe. Sustainable implementation requires coordinated EU efforts, and dynamic MTBs that continuously refine genomic-driven decisions within real-world contexts.
AB - INTRODUCTION: The CAN.HEAL consortium, comprising 47 cancer centers and academic institutions across 17 EU countries, has developed a set of recommendations for Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs) to address the lack of standardized guidelines in personalized cancer medicine.METHODS: Over the past 2 years, through extensive collaboration and seven dedicated online meetings, CAN.HEAL experts developed consensus-based recommendations across 10 critical domains.RESULTS: The consortium agreed that MTBs' primary role is to perform molecular and clinical assessments for patients requiring care beyond standard treatment. Core MTB composition should include medical oncologists, molecular biologists, pathologists, and bioinformaticians. Patient eligibility criteria should prioritize performance status, with flexibility for rare cases. Shared informed consent is crucial for sample collection, data use, and research. A two-tiered IT workflow, with minimal and maximal datasets, is recommended, along with a comprehensive decision support tool. These recommendations focus on genomic testing, acknowledging diversity of NGS assays and proposing general guidelines. MTB reports should be concise, with technical details provided in the molecular diagnostic report. Innovative approaches like the Drug Rediscovery Protocol support access to off-label therapies. Harmonized training for MTB members is essential to bridging knowledge gaps in this evolving field. Indicators are needed to assess MTB effectiveness over time. Expanding MTB benefits to underserved populations depends on creating a shared European MTB database.CONCLUSION: Standardizing MTB practices represents a key step toward equitable access to personalized medicine and improved cancer care across Europe. Sustainable implementation requires coordinated EU efforts, and dynamic MTBs that continuously refine genomic-driven decisions within real-world contexts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002854516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115433
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115433
M3 - Article
C2 - 40253820
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 222
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
M1 - 115433
ER -