Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessment of TREC-Based NBS SCID Reporting Practices for Harmonization of Results and Interpretation: A Global Survey

  • Jahnavi Aluri
  • , Amy Gaviglio
  • , Isaac Kistler
  • , Dianne Webster
  • , Anne Pham-Huy
  • , Monica G. Lawrence
  • , Joyce E. Yu
  • , Jovanka King
  • , Muatasem Alsuweiti
  • , Madara Auzenbaha
  • , Tadej Avcin
  • , Caner Aytekin
  • , Marie Baekvad-Hansen
  • , Yin Hsiu Chien
  • , Peter Ciznar
  • , Anders Fasth
  • , Elisabeth Förster-Waldl
  • , Kimberly Gilmour
  • , David Hagin
  • , Kohsuke Imai
  • Yae Jean Kim, Nataļja Kurjāne, Giancarlo La Marca, Johanna Lempainen, Timothy Ronan Leahy, Woei Kang Liew, Nizar Mahlaoui, Michel J. Massaad, Andrea Martin-Nalda, Tania Nicole Masmas, Jana Pachlopnik-Schmid, Ekaterina Polyakova, Jane Peake, Sulay Rivera, Francisco J. Espinosa-Rosales, Francisco Rodriguez-Quiroz, Anna Sediva, Ali Sobh, Pere Soler-Palacin, Asbjørg Stray-Pedersen, Mervi Taskinen, Svetlana Vorslova, Watson Wang, Jennifer R. Heimall, Nicola A.M. Wright, Xiao P. Peng, Antonio Condino-Neto, Lisa Kobrynski, Jennifer M. Puck, Fabian Hauck, Roshini S. Abraham*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) using T-cell receptor excision circles in dried blood spots has been implemented in the United States and many other regions and countries globally. The Clinical Immunology Society and the Association of Public Health Laboratories jointly formed the SCID Harmonization Initiative to facilitate comparison of NBS reporting practices to promote global consensus and collaboration. Objective: To assess current NBS SCID practices using a global survey and to report the findings from the phase 1 component. Methods: An 18-question survey was distributed to all known SCID screening programs worldwide. Only 1 response per region was analyzed. Examples of international screening algorithms were also solicited and included. Results: A total of 200 responses were received, of which 80 responses were unique and used for further analysis. Of the 39 non-US countries, 15 (38%) reported national universal screening and 24 (62%) reported regional, pilot, or other screening. Additional questions pertained to methodology and reporting, with particular emphasis on communication of the clinical urgency of an abnormal T-cell receptor excision circle result. Conclusions: This global survey confirmed that the approach to NBS SCID varies widely, underscoring the need for harmonization at multiple steps, particularly for reporting and interpretation. This is the first study to capture global NBS SCID practices, and these findings provide the basis for creation of a phase 2 consensus reporting framework, which will be developed by the same SCID Harmonization Committee that created the current study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1153-1164
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2026
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords*

  • Newborn screening (NBS)
  • rare disorders
  • Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)
  • T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs)

Field of Science

  • 3.2 Clinical medicine
  • 3.1 Basic medicine
  • 3.3 Health sciences

Publication Type*

  • 1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of TREC-Based NBS SCID Reporting Practices for Harmonization of Results and Interpretation: A Global Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this