Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Breast cancer screening in Europe and the role of general practitioners: A 32-country comparative survey

  • Dimitra Iosifina Papageorgiou (Corresponding Author)
  • , Emmanouil Smyrnakis
  • , Michael Harris
  • , Ilze Skuja
  • , Zlata Ožvačić Adžić
  • , Gergana Apostolova
  • , Sherihane Bensemmane
  • , Mette Brekke
  • , Krzysztof Buczkowski
  • , Nicola Buono
  • , Jako Burgers
  • , Jeļena Daniļenko
  • , Cecilia Högberg
  • , Didem Kafadar
  • , Tuomas Koskela
  • , Norbert Kral
  • , Roland Kraxner
  • , Lucas Küppers
  • , Delphine Legoff
  • , Mercè Marzo-Castillejo
  • Anina Pless, Natalia Ponzel, Aida Puia, Rūta Radzevičienė-Jurgutė, Patrick Redmond, Kristi Särgava, Marij Petek Šter, Marika Sulashvili, Peter Vedsted, Xénia Wöstmann, Marija Zafirovska, Ricardo Zaidan, Robert Hoffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the commonest cancer in women, and screening can allow earlier-stage diagnosis. While there are European recommendations on the age-range and frequency of breast cancer screening, participation in these programmes varies substantially, and this could be due to differences in how they are organised and implemented. The role that primary healthcare professionals play in the process is unclear.We aimed to describe the breast cancer screening programmes in European countries and investigate how primary healthcare professionals are involved in this screening process.

METHODS: A cross-sectional survey in 32 countries. Key informants with relevant expertise answered online questions about the characteristics of their screening programmes and general practitioners' (GPs') roles in this. Responses were refined through an iterative consensus process. Data were examined to identify patterns in GP engagement.

RESULTS: We found important differences between European breast cancer screening systems. While most had population-based screening, four countries relied on opportunistic screening. In 15 countries GPs had little or no involvement in the process of breast cancer screening, and in 13 countries GPs had some involvement, including identifying eligible patients, issuing referrals, and following-up results. Screening uptake rates tended to be higher in countries with well-established population-based screening programmes which give little or no GP involvement. Few countries linked GP engagement to incentives or performance measures.

CONCLUSION: Countries with lower screening uptake should consider either enhancing GP involvement or transitioning to a structured, population-based screening system. Further research should explore how best to integrate primary care within national screening strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2689646
JournalThe European Journal of General Practice
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords*

  • Humans
  • Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis
  • Female
  • Europe
  • Early Detection of Cancer/methods
  • General Practitioners/organization & administration
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Mass Screening/methods
  • Physician's Role
  • Primary Health Care/organization & administration
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Field of Science*

  • 3.3 Health sciences

Publication Type*

  • 1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Breast cancer screening in Europe and the role of general practitioners: A 32-country comparative survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this