Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire (BCSQ-36): reliability and validity study in Latvia

Marija Abeltina (Coresponding Author), Ieva Stokenberga, Justine Skudra, Malgozata Rascevska, Aleksandrs Kolesovs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)


The study aimed to test the validity of the burnout subtypes hierarchic model operationalized by the ‘Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire’ (BCSQ-36) and its applicability in other cultures. To that aim psychometric properties, factorial and convergent validity regarding the Maslach Burnout Inventory–General Survey (MBI-GS), and correlation with demographic factors were reviewed. A voluntary internet-based approach was used on a multi-occupational sample of adult Latvians (n = 394). The results of the internal consistency of the Latvian version of the BCSQ-36 exceeded.89 for all three subtypes. The CFA was used to test a hierarchical factorial model, and the analysis revealed an acceptable fit of the model to the data. Correlation analysis showed results as expected, similarly to the original sample–Underchallenged and Worn-out subtypes correlated with all MBI-GS scales, while Frenetic subtype did not correlate with the MBI-GS Cynicism scale. Besides, demographic data showed some correlation only on the subscale level. Overall research results provide support of the validity of the burnout subtypes hierarchical model and applicability in another culture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalPsychology, Health and Medicine
Issue numbersup1
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2020
Externally publishedYes


  • BCSQ-36
  • Burnout
  • burnout subtypes
  • convergent validity
  • factorial validity

Field of Science*

  • 3.2 Clinical medicine
  • 5.1 Psychology

Publication Type*

  • 1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database


Dive into the research topics of 'Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire (BCSQ-36): reliability and validity study in Latvia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this