Activities per year
Abstract
Objectives. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of adolescent self-reported internalising and externalising difficulties in a clinical sample of adolescents seeking help in an outpatient psychiatric clinic and examine the clinical utility of the SDQ as a screening tool for predicting clinically determined mental health diagnoses.
Materials and Methods. The study was conducted at the Children’s Clinical University Hospital in Riga. The study group comprised 11-17 y.o. patients who received outpatient psychiatry care. SDQ self- report was used. It consists of emotional and peer problem subscales (combined – internalising difficulties), conduct and hyperactivity subscales (combined – externalising difficulties) and total difficulties scale. According to ICD-10, internalising disorders in this study were F3x, F4x, F50, F51, F93, externalising disorders included F1x, F90, F91, F92. When analysing the score, the Latvian community sample cut-off scores were used, 80th percentile was used for defining “high” score.
Results. 207 valid adolescent reports were analysed. Adolescents were mostly female (60.9%, N = 126), mean age 13.9 years. 58.9% had an internalising diagnosis, 23.2% an externalising diagnosis. In self-reports, 41.5% of adolescents reported high scores in internalising difficulties, and 27.1% reported high scores in externalising difficulties scale. High scores in emotional (r = 0.29, p < 0.0001), internalising (r = 0.29. p < 0.0001) and total difficulties (r = 0.21, p = 0.004) correlated positively with an internalising diagnosis, with sensitivity 50-66% and specificity 64-73%. A high score in the conduct subscale (r = 0.22, p = 0.002) correlated positively with an externalising diagnosis, with a sensitivity of 32% and a specificity 88%.
Conclusions. Emotional, internalising, and total difficulty scales showed a correlation with internalising clinical diagnoses, and conduct scale showed a correlation to externalising clinical diagnoses. Correlations were weak, and scale specificity was low. For the Latvian adolescent population, self-report SDQ may be better used to screen for internalising difficulties, and overall, both parent and adolescent reports should be used for more precise screening results.
Materials and Methods. The study was conducted at the Children’s Clinical University Hospital in Riga. The study group comprised 11-17 y.o. patients who received outpatient psychiatry care. SDQ self- report was used. It consists of emotional and peer problem subscales (combined – internalising difficulties), conduct and hyperactivity subscales (combined – externalising difficulties) and total difficulties scale. According to ICD-10, internalising disorders in this study were F3x, F4x, F50, F51, F93, externalising disorders included F1x, F90, F91, F92. When analysing the score, the Latvian community sample cut-off scores were used, 80th percentile was used for defining “high” score.
Results. 207 valid adolescent reports were analysed. Adolescents were mostly female (60.9%, N = 126), mean age 13.9 years. 58.9% had an internalising diagnosis, 23.2% an externalising diagnosis. In self-reports, 41.5% of adolescents reported high scores in internalising difficulties, and 27.1% reported high scores in externalising difficulties scale. High scores in emotional (r = 0.29, p < 0.0001), internalising (r = 0.29. p < 0.0001) and total difficulties (r = 0.21, p = 0.004) correlated positively with an internalising diagnosis, with sensitivity 50-66% and specificity 64-73%. A high score in the conduct subscale (r = 0.22, p = 0.002) correlated positively with an externalising diagnosis, with a sensitivity of 32% and a specificity 88%.
Conclusions. Emotional, internalising, and total difficulty scales showed a correlation with internalising clinical diagnoses, and conduct scale showed a correlation to externalising clinical diagnoses. Correlations were weak, and scale specificity was low. For the Latvian adolescent population, self-report SDQ may be better used to screen for internalising difficulties, and overall, both parent and adolescent reports should be used for more precise screening results.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 245 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Medicina (Kaunas) |
Volume | 59 |
Issue number | Suppl.2 |
Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Event | RSU Research Week 2023: Research Week 2023 Rīga Stradiņš University - Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia Duration: 27 Mar 2023 → 31 Mar 2023 https://rw2023.rsu.lv/general-information https://rw2023.rsu.lv |
Field of Science*
- 3.2 Clinical medicine
Publication Type*
- 3.4. Other publications in conference proceedings (including local)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical utility of the self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient setting.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Activities
- 1 Poster presentation
-
Clinical Utility of the Self-Report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Outpatient Setting
Kočāne, A. (Speaker), Miķelsons, G. R. (Co-author) & Bezborodovs, Ņ. (Co-author)
29 Mar 2023Activity: Talk or presentation types › Poster presentation