Abstract
Background
Type A acute aortic intramural hematomas (IMHs), especially with thrombi in the ascending aorta, pose an increased risk of complications relative to Type B. The therapeutic direction for Type A IMH remains contentious. This study contrasts the outcomes of TEVAR and open surgical approaches in managing IMHs.
Methods
We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis involving patients diagnosed with either Type A, retrograde A, or Type B IMH who underwent either surgical or endovascular treatments from January 2017 to December 2020. Parameters such as three-year survival, overall mortality, vascular and hemorrhagic events, renal damage, cardiac anomalies, neurological events, and need for re-intervention or readmission were scrutinized.
Results
Our cohort included 31 patients with IMH who received post-intervention follow-up. The subgroups were categorized into: 11 after Type A surgical treatment (average age: 63 ± 9 years; 55% male), 7 after Type A endovascular treatment (average age: 67 ± 6 years; 57% male), and 13 after Type B endovascular treatment (average age: 64 ± 8 years; 77% male). Notably, the median hospital stay durations for IMH-A, retrograde IMH-A, and IMH-B were 13, 5, and 4 days, respectively. Postoperative complications were markedly prevalent in IMH-A (n=8, 73%) relative to the retrograde IMH-A and IMH-B categories. One and three-year survival rates post-repair were discerned to be 82%/68%, 100%/100%, and 100%/75% for Type A surgical, Type A endovascular, and Type B endovascular approaches, respectively.
Conclusions
Aortic IMHs are notably linked to aortic dissections, leading to life-threatening outcomes. Despite the traditional preference for surgical remedies in most IMH instances, our data suggests that TEVAR offers a promising, minimally invasive alternative, especially for Type A retrograde and Type B IMHs.
Type A acute aortic intramural hematomas (IMHs), especially with thrombi in the ascending aorta, pose an increased risk of complications relative to Type B. The therapeutic direction for Type A IMH remains contentious. This study contrasts the outcomes of TEVAR and open surgical approaches in managing IMHs.
Methods
We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis involving patients diagnosed with either Type A, retrograde A, or Type B IMH who underwent either surgical or endovascular treatments from January 2017 to December 2020. Parameters such as three-year survival, overall mortality, vascular and hemorrhagic events, renal damage, cardiac anomalies, neurological events, and need for re-intervention or readmission were scrutinized.
Results
Our cohort included 31 patients with IMH who received post-intervention follow-up. The subgroups were categorized into: 11 after Type A surgical treatment (average age: 63 ± 9 years; 55% male), 7 after Type A endovascular treatment (average age: 67 ± 6 years; 57% male), and 13 after Type B endovascular treatment (average age: 64 ± 8 years; 77% male). Notably, the median hospital stay durations for IMH-A, retrograde IMH-A, and IMH-B were 13, 5, and 4 days, respectively. Postoperative complications were markedly prevalent in IMH-A (n=8, 73%) relative to the retrograde IMH-A and IMH-B categories. One and three-year survival rates post-repair were discerned to be 82%/68%, 100%/100%, and 100%/75% for Type A surgical, Type A endovascular, and Type B endovascular approaches, respectively.
Conclusions
Aortic IMHs are notably linked to aortic dissections, leading to life-threatening outcomes. Despite the traditional preference for surgical remedies in most IMH instances, our data suggests that TEVAR offers a promising, minimally invasive alternative, especially for Type A retrograde and Type B IMHs.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 934-934 |
Journal | Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) |
Volume | 83 |
Issue number | 13, Suppl.A |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 6 Apr 2024 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | American College of Cardiology’s 73rd Scientific Session and Expo - Atlanta, United States Duration: 6 Apr 2024 → 8 Apr 2024 Conference number: 73 https://www.expo.acc.org/ACC24/Public/enter.aspx |
Keywords*
- TEVAR
- intramural hematoma
- mortality
- Survival analysis
- endovascular interventions
Field of Science*
- 3.2 Clinical medicine
- 3.1 Basic medicine
- 1.6 Biological sciences
- 2.8 Environmental biotechnology
- 3.3 Health sciences
- 2.10 Nano-technology
Publication Type*
- 3.4. Other publications in conference proceedings (including local)