Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Darolutamide and health-related quality of life in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: An analysis of the phase III ARAMIS trial

  • Matthew R. Smith (Corresponding Author)
  • , Neal Shore
  • , Teuvo L. Tammela
  • , Albertas Ulys
  • , Egils Vjaters
  • , Sergey Polyakov
  • , Mindaugas Jievaltas
  • , Murilo Luz
  • , Boris Alekseev
  • , Iris Kuss
  • , Marie Aude Le Berre
  • , Ateesha F. Mohamed
  • , Dawn Odom
  • , Jennifer Bartsch
  • , Amir Snapir
  • , Toni Sarapohja
  • , Karim Fizazi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)
52 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the ARAMIS trial, darolutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus placebo plus ADT significantly improved metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS) and time to pain progression in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Herein, we present analyses of patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial randomised patients with nmCRPC and prostate-specific antigen doubling time ≤10 months to darolutamide 600 mg (n = 955) twice daily or matched placebo (n = 554) while continuing ADT. The primary end-point was MFS; the secondary end-points included OS and time to pain progression. In this analysis, HRQoL was assessed by the time to deterioration using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) prostate cancer subscale (PCS) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Prostate Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-PR25) subscales.

RESULTS: Darolutamide significantly prolonged time to deterioration of FACT-P PCS versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.91; P = 0.0005) at the primary analysis (cut-off date: 3rd September 2018). Time to deterioration of EORTC QLQ-PR25 outcomes showed statistically significant delays with darolutamide versus placebo for urinary (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54-0.76; P < 0.0001) and bowel (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.92; P = 0.0027) symptoms. Time to worsening of hormonal treatment-related symptoms was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: In patients with nmCRPC who are generally asymptomatic, darolutamide maintained HRQoL by significantly delaying time to deterioration of prostate cancer-specific quality of life and disease-related symptoms versus placebo.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-146
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume154
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords*

  • Bowel symptoms
  • Darolutamide
  • Hormonal treatment–related symptoms
  • Non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)
  • Quality of life
  • Urinary symptoms

Field of Science*

  • 3.2 Clinical medicine
  • 3.1 Basic medicine

Publication Type*

  • 1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Darolutamide and health-related quality of life in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: An analysis of the phase III ARAMIS trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this