Emerging Therapeutic Modalities and Pharmacotherapies in Neuropathic Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Parallel Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Ernest Kissi Kontor (Corresponding Author)
  • , Catherine Wellan
  • , Hafiz Mohammad Maaz
  • , Daha Garba Muhammad
  • , Almonzer Al-Qiami
  • , Amin Sharifan
  • , Jessica Kumah
  • , Hester Lacey
  • , Abdelmonem Siddiq
  • , Nityanand Jain (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Neuropathic pain (NP) is a chronic condition caused by abnormal neuronal excitability in the nervous system. Current treatments for NP are often ineffective or poorly tolerated. Hence, we reviewed the efficacy and safety of novel drugs or devices that target neuronal excitability in NP patients compared with placebo, sham, or usual care interventions. Methods: Six databases were searched for parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting novel devices (rTMS, SCS, and TENS) or drugs (EMA401, capsaicin 8% patch, and Sativex) for NP. Data were extracted and quality was assessed using the ROB2 tool. The random-effects inverse variance method was used for analysis. Results: In our review of 30 RCTs with 4251 participants, device-based interventions were found to be more effective in reducing pain scores than control interventions (SMD = -1.27, 95% CI: -1.92 to -0.62). However, high heterogeneity was seen ( p < 0.01, I 2  = 91%), attributable to the etiology of NP ( R 2  = 58.84%) and year of publication ( R 2  = 49.49%). Funding source and type of control comparator were ruled out as cause of heterogeneity. Although drug interventions did not differ from placebo interventions in absolute pain reduction (SMD = -1.21, 95% CI: -3.55 to 1.13), when comparing relative change in pain intensity from baseline, drug interventions were found to be effective (SMD = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.04-0.55). Asymmetry in the funnel plot was visualized, suggesting publication bias. Certainty of evidence was very low according to GRADE assessment. Conclusions: Our review indicates that device-based interventions are more effective than control interventions in reducing pain intensity in NP. Nevertheless, available evidence is limited due to heterogeneity and publication bias, prompting the need for more high-quality RCTs to confirm the efficacy and safety of these interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6782574
Pages (from-to)6782574
Number of pages25
JournalPain Research and Management
Volume2024
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Dec 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords*

  • Capsaicin
  • EMA401
  • neuropathic pain
  • Sativex
  • spinal cord stimulation
  • transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • trans- cutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Field of Science*

  • 1.6 Biological sciences
  • 3.2 Clinical medicine
  • 3.1 Basic medicine
  • 1.4 Chemical sciences

Publication Type*

  • 1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emerging Therapeutic Modalities and Pharmacotherapies in Neuropathic Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Parallel Randomized Controlled Trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this