TY - CONF
T1 - Evaluation of dose-area product received by patients undergoing iliac and peripheral leg artery angioplasty with two different angiography machines
AU - Šilovs, Artūrs
AU - Strušele, Iveta Eihmane
AU - Zemīte, Elīna
AU - Kratovska, Aina
AU - Ivanova, Patrīcija
AU - Bernšteins, Andrejs
AU - Zdanovskis, Nauris
AU - Zaiceva, Veronika
AU - Mundeciems, Andrejs
AU - Ponomarjova, Sanita
PY - 2021/3/24
Y1 - 2021/3/24
N2 - Radiation
safety is turned into a cornerstone of patient safety during
interventional radiology (IR) procedures. With increasing number of
IR procedures, consequences and amount of radiation dose received by
patients is becoming an essential question. A study was carried to
evaluate the difference of dose-area product (DAP) between two
fluoroscopy machines in one of IR departments in Latvia. Study
included patients, who underwent iliac artery and peripheral leg
artery IR procedures – iliac artery percutaneous transluminal
angioplasty (PTA), femoral artery PTA, a.poplitea PTA, crural artery
PTA. Directly measured DAP (mGy/cm2)
from two different generation angiography machines, Philips Allura
Xper FD 20/10 and Philips Azurion Clarity 7 B20/15, time and type of
procedure in interventional radiology department during 2019 year
were used for retrospective analysis. Descriptive and analytical
statistics were performed using the SPSSv26 software. Our
study group comprised 290 patients: 139 in iliac PTA group, 96 in
femoral and popliteal PTA, 55 in crural PTA. Median DAP between
modern and former generation machines in iliac artery PTA was 80.00
[Confidence interval: 56.60-116.00] and 250.23 [177.24-294.25]
respectively (p=0.0001), in femoral and popliteal artery PTA 57.32
[43.36-70.64] vs 61.00 [48.11-81.67] respectively (p=0.0001), in
crural artery PTA 45.40 [19.65-102.54] vs 76.69 [58.40-109.92]
respectively (p=0.0001). Correlation between DAP and operator was
found only in femoral and popliteal PTA group (p=0.037). There was no
significant correlation between time of procedure and different
machines in all three groups. To
our knowledge, there were no previous studies exploring
peripheral artery procedure DAP in Latvian facilities. We have found
significant DAP difference between two angiography machines, which
was not affected by the time of procedure or operator in iliac and
crural PTA groups.
AB - Radiation
safety is turned into a cornerstone of patient safety during
interventional radiology (IR) procedures. With increasing number of
IR procedures, consequences and amount of radiation dose received by
patients is becoming an essential question. A study was carried to
evaluate the difference of dose-area product (DAP) between two
fluoroscopy machines in one of IR departments in Latvia. Study
included patients, who underwent iliac artery and peripheral leg
artery IR procedures – iliac artery percutaneous transluminal
angioplasty (PTA), femoral artery PTA, a.poplitea PTA, crural artery
PTA. Directly measured DAP (mGy/cm2)
from two different generation angiography machines, Philips Allura
Xper FD 20/10 and Philips Azurion Clarity 7 B20/15, time and type of
procedure in interventional radiology department during 2019 year
were used for retrospective analysis. Descriptive and analytical
statistics were performed using the SPSSv26 software. Our
study group comprised 290 patients: 139 in iliac PTA group, 96 in
femoral and popliteal PTA, 55 in crural PTA. Median DAP between
modern and former generation machines in iliac artery PTA was 80.00
[Confidence interval: 56.60-116.00] and 250.23 [177.24-294.25]
respectively (p=0.0001), in femoral and popliteal artery PTA 57.32
[43.36-70.64] vs 61.00 [48.11-81.67] respectively (p=0.0001), in
crural artery PTA 45.40 [19.65-102.54] vs 76.69 [58.40-109.92]
respectively (p=0.0001). Correlation between DAP and operator was
found only in femoral and popliteal PTA group (p=0.037). There was no
significant correlation between time of procedure and different
machines in all three groups. To
our knowledge, there were no previous studies exploring
peripheral artery procedure DAP in Latvian facilities. We have found
significant DAP difference between two angiography machines, which
was not affected by the time of procedure or operator in iliac and
crural PTA groups.
M3 - Abstract
SP - 499
T2 - RSU Research week 2021: Knowledge for Use in Practice
Y2 - 24 March 2021 through 26 March 2021
ER -