TY - JOUR
T1 - Guselkumab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (QUASAR)
T2 - phase 3 double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled induction and maintenance studies
AU - Rubin, David T.
AU - Allegretti, Jessica R.
AU - Panés, Julián
AU - Shipitofsky, Nicole
AU - Yarandi, Shadi S.
AU - Huang, Kuan Hsiang Gary
AU - Germinaro, Matthew
AU - Wilson, Rebbecca
AU - Zhang, Hongyan
AU - Johanns, Jewel
AU - Feagan, Brian G.
AU - Hisamatsu, Tadakazu
AU - Lichtenstein, Gary R.
AU - Bressler, Brian
AU - Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent
AU - Sands, Bruce E.
AU - Dignass, Axel
AU - QUASAR Study Group
A2 - Abrahamovych, Orest
A2 - Abu-Farsakh, Niazy
A2 - Afanasieva, Halyna
A2 - Akpinar, Hale
A2 - Kharrat, Houssam Al
A2 - Altintas, Engin
A2 - Altwegg, Romain
A2 - Andreev, Pavel
A2 - Aomatsu, Kazuki
A2 - Araki, Hiroshi
A2 - Argollo, Marjorie
A2 - Ariel, Federico
A2 - Armuzzi, Alessandro
A2 - Ashida, Toshifumi
A2 - Augustyn, Monika
A2 - Aumais, Guy
A2 - Azum, Martín
A2 - Baert, Filip
A2 - Balaz, Jozef
A2 - Balderramo, Domingo
A2 - Begun, Jakob
A2 - Berova, Temenuzhka
A2 - Billiauws, Lore
A2 - Blanco, Antonio
A2 - Bortlik, Martin
A2 - Bossa, Fabrizio
A2 - Cao, Qian
A2 - Pokrotnieks, Juris
A2 - Tolmanis, Ivars
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/1/4
Y1 - 2025/1/4
N2 - Background: Interleukin-23 inhibition is effective in treating ulcerative colitis. Guselkumab is a dual-acting, human IgG1, interleukin-23p19 subunit inhibitor that potently neutralises interleukin-23 and can bind to CD64. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis. Methods: The primary populations of these two phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (QUASAR phase 3 induction and maintenance) included randomised and treated adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (induction baseline modified Mayo score from 5 to 9) with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional or advanced ulcerative colitis therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (3:2) to receive guselkumab 200 mg given intravenously or placebo at weeks 0, 4, and 8 (phase 3 induction study). All patients were randomly assigned using web-based interactive response technology. Patients in clinical response 12 weeks after guselkumab induction given intravenously (from QUASAR phase 2b and phase 3 induction studies) were randomly assigned (1:1:1) at maintenance week 0 to guselkumab 200 mg given subcutaneously every 4 weeks or 100 mg every 8 weeks or placebo for 44 weeks (maintenance). Primary endpoints were clinical remission at induction week 12 and maintenance week 44. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04033445. Findings: The induction study primary population included 701 patients (guselkumab 200 mg given intravenously 60% [421 patients]; placebo 40% [280 patients]). The maintenance study primary population included 568 guselkumab induction responders randomly assigned to receive guselkumab 200 mg given subcutaneously every 4 weeks (190 [33%] patients) or 100 mg every 8 weeks (188 [33%] patients) or placebo (guselkumab withdrawal 190 [33%] patients). A significantly greater proportion of patients treated with guselkumab given intravenously had clinical remission at induction week 12 (23% [95 of 421 patients]) than did placebo-treated patients (8% [22 of 280 patients]; adjusted treatment difference 15%, 95% CI 10–20; p<0·0001). Clinical remission at maintenance week 44 was achieved by a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with guselkumab 200 mg given subcutaneously every 4 weeks (50% [95 of 190 patients]; adjusted treatment difference 30%, 95% CI 21–38; p<0·0001) and 100 mg every 8 weeks (45% [85 of 188 patients]; adjusted treatment difference 25%, 16–34; p<0·0001) than with placebo (19% [36 of 190 patients]). The overall safety profile was favourable and consistent with that of guselkumab in approved indications. In the induction study, adverse events were reported by 49% of patients in both groups (208 of 421 guselkumab-treated patients and 138 of 280 placebo-treated patients), serious adverse events were reported by 3% (12 of 421) of guselkumab-treated patients and 7% (20 of 280) of placebo-treated patients, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were reported by 2% (seven of 421) of guselkumab-treated patients and 4% (11 of 280) of placebo-treated patients. In the maintenance study, adverse event rates were similar among groups, and the most frequently reported adverse events in all groups were ulcerative colitis, COVID-19, and arthralgia. No active tuberculosis, anaphylaxis, serum sickness, or clinically important hepatic disorders were reported in either study. Interpretation: Guselkumab was effective and safe as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Funding: Janssen Research and Development.
AB - Background: Interleukin-23 inhibition is effective in treating ulcerative colitis. Guselkumab is a dual-acting, human IgG1, interleukin-23p19 subunit inhibitor that potently neutralises interleukin-23 and can bind to CD64. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis. Methods: The primary populations of these two phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (QUASAR phase 3 induction and maintenance) included randomised and treated adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (induction baseline modified Mayo score from 5 to 9) with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional or advanced ulcerative colitis therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (3:2) to receive guselkumab 200 mg given intravenously or placebo at weeks 0, 4, and 8 (phase 3 induction study). All patients were randomly assigned using web-based interactive response technology. Patients in clinical response 12 weeks after guselkumab induction given intravenously (from QUASAR phase 2b and phase 3 induction studies) were randomly assigned (1:1:1) at maintenance week 0 to guselkumab 200 mg given subcutaneously every 4 weeks or 100 mg every 8 weeks or placebo for 44 weeks (maintenance). Primary endpoints were clinical remission at induction week 12 and maintenance week 44. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04033445. Findings: The induction study primary population included 701 patients (guselkumab 200 mg given intravenously 60% [421 patients]; placebo 40% [280 patients]). The maintenance study primary population included 568 guselkumab induction responders randomly assigned to receive guselkumab 200 mg given subcutaneously every 4 weeks (190 [33%] patients) or 100 mg every 8 weeks (188 [33%] patients) or placebo (guselkumab withdrawal 190 [33%] patients). A significantly greater proportion of patients treated with guselkumab given intravenously had clinical remission at induction week 12 (23% [95 of 421 patients]) than did placebo-treated patients (8% [22 of 280 patients]; adjusted treatment difference 15%, 95% CI 10–20; p<0·0001). Clinical remission at maintenance week 44 was achieved by a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with guselkumab 200 mg given subcutaneously every 4 weeks (50% [95 of 190 patients]; adjusted treatment difference 30%, 95% CI 21–38; p<0·0001) and 100 mg every 8 weeks (45% [85 of 188 patients]; adjusted treatment difference 25%, 16–34; p<0·0001) than with placebo (19% [36 of 190 patients]). The overall safety profile was favourable and consistent with that of guselkumab in approved indications. In the induction study, adverse events were reported by 49% of patients in both groups (208 of 421 guselkumab-treated patients and 138 of 280 placebo-treated patients), serious adverse events were reported by 3% (12 of 421) of guselkumab-treated patients and 7% (20 of 280) of placebo-treated patients, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were reported by 2% (seven of 421) of guselkumab-treated patients and 4% (11 of 280) of placebo-treated patients. In the maintenance study, adverse event rates were similar among groups, and the most frequently reported adverse events in all groups were ulcerative colitis, COVID-19, and arthralgia. No active tuberculosis, anaphylaxis, serum sickness, or clinically important hepatic disorders were reported in either study. Interpretation: Guselkumab was effective and safe as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Funding: Janssen Research and Development.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213523346&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39706209/
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01927-5
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01927-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 39706209
AN - SCOPUS:85213523346
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 405
SP - 33
EP - 49
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 10472
ER -