TY - JOUR
T1 - How People in Eight European Countries Felt About the Safety, Effectiveness, and Necessity of COVID-19 Vaccination
T2 - A Cross-Sectional Survey
AU - Coteur, Kristien
AU - Zafirovska, Marija
AU - Zafirovski, Aleksandar
AU - Daniļenko, Jeļena
AU - Lingner, Heidrun
AU - Bauch, Felix
AU - Brütting, Christine
AU - Buono, Nicola
AU - Lazic, Vanja
AU - Ramasaco, Liljana
AU - Siliņa, Vija
AU - Fuehner, Lara-Marie
AU - Harris, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Background/objectives: Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination vary globally, influenced by political and cultural factors. This research aimed to assess the views of people without a healthcare qualification in Europe on COVID-19 vaccination safety, effectiveness, and necessity as well as how well informed they felt. The secondary outcomes focused on how respondents’ views were affected by demographic and context factors and included a comparison by country of the level of feeling well informed. Methods: A mixed-method cross-sectional online survey in eight European countries, using convenience sampling. Results: A total of 1008 adults completed the survey, 60% of whom were female. While only 44.1% considered the vaccines safe, 43.5% effective, and 44.9% necessary, 80.0% had been vaccinated. Four in ten adults strongly agreed that they were well informed, while over a quarter did not answer the question. Younger respondents, well-informed individuals, and German respondents were more inclined to perceive COVID-19 vaccination as both effective and necessary. Conclusions: Motivations for vaccination included perceived health and social benefits, while concerns included a preference for “natural immunity”, the rapid development of the vaccine, and potential unknown long-term effects. A correlation existed between respondents feeling well informed about the different COVID-19 vaccines in their country and the likelihood of having been vaccinated.
AB - Background/objectives: Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination vary globally, influenced by political and cultural factors. This research aimed to assess the views of people without a healthcare qualification in Europe on COVID-19 vaccination safety, effectiveness, and necessity as well as how well informed they felt. The secondary outcomes focused on how respondents’ views were affected by demographic and context factors and included a comparison by country of the level of feeling well informed. Methods: A mixed-method cross-sectional online survey in eight European countries, using convenience sampling. Results: A total of 1008 adults completed the survey, 60% of whom were female. While only 44.1% considered the vaccines safe, 43.5% effective, and 44.9% necessary, 80.0% had been vaccinated. Four in ten adults strongly agreed that they were well informed, while over a quarter did not answer the question. Younger respondents, well-informed individuals, and German respondents were more inclined to perceive COVID-19 vaccination as both effective and necessary. Conclusions: Motivations for vaccination included perceived health and social benefits, while concerns included a preference for “natural immunity”, the rapid development of the vaccine, and potential unknown long-term effects. A correlation existed between respondents feeling well informed about the different COVID-19 vaccines in their country and the likelihood of having been vaccinated.
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/13/3/344
UR - https://www-webofscience-com.db.rsu.lv/wos/alldb/full-record/MEDLINE:39942533
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218226541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/healthcare13030344
DO - 10.3390/healthcare13030344
M3 - Article
SN - 2227-9032
VL - 13
JO - Healthcare
JF - Healthcare
IS - 3
M1 - 344
ER -