TY - JOUR
T1 - IGNITE4
T2 - Results of a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, prospective trial of eravacycline vs meropenem in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections
AU - Solomkin, Joseph S.
AU - Gardovskis, Janis
AU - Lawrence, Kenneth
AU - Montravers, Philippe
AU - Sway, Angie
AU - Evans, David
AU - Tsai, Larry
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support. This work was supported by Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Funding Information:
Potential conflicts of interest. J. S. S. has received support from Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. during the production of this manuscript and has served as a consultant to Merck, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Melinta outside of the submitted work. A. S received support from Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. during the production of this manuscript. J. G. received research funding from Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. for his role as principal investigator of this study. K. L. and L. T. are employed by Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. D. E. reports grants from Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. during the conduct of the study and grants from Merck outside of the submitted work. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
PY - 2019/9/15
Y1 - 2019/9/15
N2 - Background: Increasing antimicrobial resistance among pathogens that cause complicated intraabdominal infections (cIAIs) supports the development of new antimicrobials. Eravacycline, a novel member of the fluorocycline family, is active against multidrug-resistant bacteria including extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Methods: IGNITE4 was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Hospitalized patients with cIAI received either eravacycline 1 mg/kg every 12 hours or meropenem 1 g every 8 hours intravenously for 4-14 days. The primary objective was to demonstrate statistical noninferiority (NI) in clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit (25-31 days from start of therapy) in the microbiological intent-to-treat population using a NI margin of 12.5%. Microbiological outcomes and safety were also evaluated. Results: Eravacycline was noninferior to meropenem in the primary endpoint (177/195 [90.8%] vs 187/205 [91.2%]; difference, -0.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.3 to 5.3), exceeding the prespecified margin. Secondary endpoints included clinical cure rates in the modified ITT population (231/250 [92.4%] vs 228/249 [91.6%]; difference, 0.8; 95% CI, -4.1, 5.8) and the clinically evaluable population (218/225 [96.9%] vs 222/231 [96.1%]; (difference, 0.8; 95% CI -2.9, 4.5). In patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, clinical cure rates were 87.5% (14/16) and 84.6% (11/13) in the eravacycline and meropenem groups, respectively. Eravacycline had relatively low rates of adverse events for a drug of this class, with less than 5%, 4%, and 3% of patients experiencing nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, respectively. Conclusions: Treatment with eravacycline was noninferior to meropenem in adult patients with cIAI, including infections caused by resistant pathogens. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01844856.
AB - Background: Increasing antimicrobial resistance among pathogens that cause complicated intraabdominal infections (cIAIs) supports the development of new antimicrobials. Eravacycline, a novel member of the fluorocycline family, is active against multidrug-resistant bacteria including extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Methods: IGNITE4 was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Hospitalized patients with cIAI received either eravacycline 1 mg/kg every 12 hours or meropenem 1 g every 8 hours intravenously for 4-14 days. The primary objective was to demonstrate statistical noninferiority (NI) in clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit (25-31 days from start of therapy) in the microbiological intent-to-treat population using a NI margin of 12.5%. Microbiological outcomes and safety were also evaluated. Results: Eravacycline was noninferior to meropenem in the primary endpoint (177/195 [90.8%] vs 187/205 [91.2%]; difference, -0.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.3 to 5.3), exceeding the prespecified margin. Secondary endpoints included clinical cure rates in the modified ITT population (231/250 [92.4%] vs 228/249 [91.6%]; difference, 0.8; 95% CI, -4.1, 5.8) and the clinically evaluable population (218/225 [96.9%] vs 222/231 [96.1%]; (difference, 0.8; 95% CI -2.9, 4.5). In patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, clinical cure rates were 87.5% (14/16) and 84.6% (11/13) in the eravacycline and meropenem groups, respectively. Eravacycline had relatively low rates of adverse events for a drug of this class, with less than 5%, 4%, and 3% of patients experiencing nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, respectively. Conclusions: Treatment with eravacycline was noninferior to meropenem in adult patients with cIAI, including infections caused by resistant pathogens. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01844856.
KW - complicated intraabdominal infection
KW - Enterobacteriaceae
KW - eravacycline
KW - gram-negative bacteria
KW - multidrug resistance
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85067055105
U2 - 10.1093/cid/ciy1029
DO - 10.1093/cid/ciy1029
M3 - Article
C2 - 30561562
AN - SCOPUS:85067055105
SN - 1058-4838
VL - 69
SP - 921
EP - 929
JO - Clinical Infectious Diseases
JF - Clinical Infectious Diseases
IS - 6
ER -
