TY - JOUR
T1 - Inequalities in the patterns of dermoscopy use and training across Europe
T2 - conclusions of the Eurodermoscopy pan-European survey
AU - Eurodermoscopy Working Group
A2 - Forsea, Ana Maria
A2 - Tschandl, Philipp
A2 - Zalaudek, Iris
A2 - Del Marmol, Veronique
A2 - Soyer, H. Peter
A2 - Argenziano, Giuseppe
A2 - Geller, Alan C.
A2 - Arenbergerova, Monika
A2 - Azenha, Angelo
A2 - Blum, Andreas
A2 - Bowling, Jonathan C.
A2 - Braun, Ralph P.
A2 - Bylaite-Bucinskiene, Matilda
A2 - Čabrijan, Leo
A2 - Dobrev, Hristo
A2 - Helppikangas, Hana
A2 - Karls, Raimonds
A2 - Krumkachou, Uladzimir
A2 - Kukutsch, Nicole
A2 - McCormack, Iona
A2 - Mekokishvili, Lali
A2 - Nathansohn, Nir
A2 - Nielsen, Kari
A2 - Olah, Judit
A2 - Özdemir, Fezal
A2 - Puig, Susana
A2 - Rubegni, Pietro
A2 - Rucigaj, Tanja Planinsek
A2 - Schopf, Thomas R.
A2 - Sergeev, Vasily
A2 - Stratigos, Alexander
A2 - Thomas, Luc
A2 - Tiodorovic, Danica
A2 - Vahlberg, Ave
A2 - Zafirovik, Zorica
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, JLE/Springer.
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - Background: Dermoscopy is a widely used technique, recommended in clinical practice guidelines worldwide for the early diagnosis of skin cancers. Intra-European disparities are reported for early detection and prognosis of skin cancers, however, no information exists about regional variation in patterns of dermoscopy use across Europe. Objective: To evaluate the regional differences in patterns of dermoscopy use and training among European dermatologists. Materials & Methods: An online survey of European-registered dermatologists regarding dermoscopy training, practice and attitudes was established. Answers from Eastern (EE) versus Western European (WE) countries were compared and their correlation with their respective countries’ gross domestic product/capita (GDPc) and total and government health expenditure/capita (THEc and GHEc) was analysed. Results: We received 4,049 responses from 14 WE countries and 3,431 from 18 EE countries. A higher proportion of WE respondents reported dermoscopy use (98% vs. 77%, p<0.001) and training during residency (43% vs. 32%) or anytime (96.5% vs. 87.6%) (p<0.001) compared to EE respondents. The main obstacles in dermoscopy use were poor access to dermoscopy equipment in EE and a lack of confidence in one’s skills in WE. GDPc, THEc and GHEc correlated with rate of dermoscopy use and dermoscopy training during residency (Spearman rho: 0.5–0.7, p<0.05), and inversely with availability of dermoscopy equipment. Conclusion: The rates and patterns of dermoscopy use vary significantly between Western and Eastern Europe, on a background of economic inequality. Regionally adapted interventions to increase access to dermoscopy equipment and training might enhance the use of this technique towards improving the early detection of skin cancers.
AB - Background: Dermoscopy is a widely used technique, recommended in clinical practice guidelines worldwide for the early diagnosis of skin cancers. Intra-European disparities are reported for early detection and prognosis of skin cancers, however, no information exists about regional variation in patterns of dermoscopy use across Europe. Objective: To evaluate the regional differences in patterns of dermoscopy use and training among European dermatologists. Materials & Methods: An online survey of European-registered dermatologists regarding dermoscopy training, practice and attitudes was established. Answers from Eastern (EE) versus Western European (WE) countries were compared and their correlation with their respective countries’ gross domestic product/capita (GDPc) and total and government health expenditure/capita (THEc and GHEc) was analysed. Results: We received 4,049 responses from 14 WE countries and 3,431 from 18 EE countries. A higher proportion of WE respondents reported dermoscopy use (98% vs. 77%, p<0.001) and training during residency (43% vs. 32%) or anytime (96.5% vs. 87.6%) (p<0.001) compared to EE respondents. The main obstacles in dermoscopy use were poor access to dermoscopy equipment in EE and a lack of confidence in one’s skills in WE. GDPc, THEc and GHEc correlated with rate of dermoscopy use and dermoscopy training during residency (Spearman rho: 0.5–0.7, p<0.05), and inversely with availability of dermoscopy equipment. Conclusion: The rates and patterns of dermoscopy use vary significantly between Western and Eastern Europe, on a background of economic inequality. Regionally adapted interventions to increase access to dermoscopy equipment and training might enhance the use of this technique towards improving the early detection of skin cancers.
KW - dermoscopy
KW - disparities
KW - Eastern Europe
KW - skin cancer
KW - training
KW - Western Europe
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096203011&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1684/ejd.2020.3872
DO - 10.1684/ejd.2020.3872
M3 - Article
C2 - 33052101
AN - SCOPUS:85096203011
SN - 1167-1122
VL - 30
SP - 524
EP - 531
JO - European Journal of Dermatology
JF - European Journal of Dermatology
IS - 5
ER -