Konstitucionālo un romiešu tiesību vēsturiskā dimensija un to attīstības tendences

It is indisputably clear that the document per se – the Constitution regulates a very wide range of laws and significant laws. It reflects the first and the prime model of the social community system and regulation thereof. Thereby the work, considering the role of interpretation and collisions and precedents, is focused on the role of the Constitutional comprehensive statutory regulations in opposition to the wider defined legal regulations. Here as the wider defined legal regulations one should understand the final product for the purpose of the Constitution, i.e., a strictly specific regulation, which is not subject to the mechanism of wider interpretation of laws, or entirely opposite norms contained in the Constitution and their significant regulation is subject to wide and comprehensive and even forfeit legal regulation. The topic under consideration contains a quite precisely defined law problem associated with generally application of law principle and implementation in the context of higher legislative acts – the Constitution. In literature the topic on the Constitution as legislative acts has been considered comparatively rarely and thereby positive law components thereof as opposed to unwritten legal regulations such as natural rights and general law principles. Topicality of analysis of peripeteia of these laws under consideration is such that measurement the Constitution applying the criterion of fundamental laws entails a natural question how far the norms defined in the Constitution are regulated and where are the limits thereof. How far the Constitution per se can be construed. In order to find the answer to these issues it is necessary to consider also an opinion on how the Constitution reflects the will of lawmakers. It is necessary to analyse the issue on how the will of lawmakers supports the Constitution and an extent of regulations provided therein.