TY - JOUR
T1 - Occupational exposure parameters for characterization of nanoparticulate matter toxicity
T2 - Metal versus wood processing
AU - Pavlovska, Ilona
AU - Martinsone, Zanna
AU - Vanadzins, Ivars
AU - Martinsone, Inese
AU - Seile, Anita
AU - Sudmalis, Pavels
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by European Social Fund project “The development of up-to-date diagnostic and research methods for the risks caused by nanoparticles and ergonomic factors at workplaces” [Agreement No. 2013/0050/1DP/1.1.1.2.0/13/APIA/VIAA/025].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Institution of Chemical Engineers.
Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - Three environments were chosen for this study (office, metal, and woodworking industries). The results obtained by an electrical low-pressure impactor (ELPI+) in this study show that the particle number concentration and surface area are significantly higher in workplaces of the metal- and wood-working industries but concentrations of mass are lower. Therefore, the characteristics of mass should not be used on their own as a representative parameter for the description of occupational exposure and cannot be used for occupational risk assessment as a single parameter. The nanoparticles ratio together with occupational exposure limits could possibly be used as the background for occupational risk assessment. At the same time, it is essential to mention that the nanoparticle ratio alone is insufficient and parameters like concentration levels, chemical composition, and shape characterization must also be taken into account, especially in occupational toxicology studies done in the future. According to the SEM data, samples from the metal industry contained more ultramicroscopic and nanometric particles (e.g. toxic metals such as Zn, Mn, and Cr) and fewer microscopic dust particles.
AB - Three environments were chosen for this study (office, metal, and woodworking industries). The results obtained by an electrical low-pressure impactor (ELPI+) in this study show that the particle number concentration and surface area are significantly higher in workplaces of the metal- and wood-working industries but concentrations of mass are lower. Therefore, the characteristics of mass should not be used on their own as a representative parameter for the description of occupational exposure and cannot be used for occupational risk assessment as a single parameter. The nanoparticles ratio together with occupational exposure limits could possibly be used as the background for occupational risk assessment. At the same time, it is essential to mention that the nanoparticle ratio alone is insufficient and parameters like concentration levels, chemical composition, and shape characterization must also be taken into account, especially in occupational toxicology studies done in the future. According to the SEM data, samples from the metal industry contained more ultramicroscopic and nanometric particles (e.g. toxic metals such as Zn, Mn, and Cr) and fewer microscopic dust particles.
KW - ELPI+
KW - Metal processing
KW - Nanoparticles
KW - Occupational exposure
KW - SEM
KW - Wood processing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962787664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.psep.2016.03.018
DO - 10.1016/j.psep.2016.03.018
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84962787664
SN - 0957-5820
VL - 102
SP - 230
EP - 237
JO - Process Safety and Environmental Protection
JF - Process Safety and Environmental Protection
ER -