TY - JOUR
T1 - Opportunities for linking research to policy
T2 - Lessons learned from implementation research in sexual and reproductive health within the ANSER network
AU - Ogbe, Emilomo
AU - Van Braeckel, Dirk
AU - Temmerman, Marleen
AU - Larsson, Elin C.
AU - Keygnaert, Ines
AU - De Los Reyes Aragón, Wilson
AU - Cheng, Feng
AU - Lazdane, Gunta
AU - Cooper, Diane
AU - Shamu, Simukai
AU - Gichangi, Peter
AU - Dias, Sónia
AU - Barrett, Hazel
AU - Nobels, Anne
AU - Pei, Kaiyan
AU - Galle, Anna
AU - Esho, Tammary
AU - Knight, Lucia
AU - Tabana, Hanani
AU - Degomme, Olivier
N1 - Funding Information:
This project involved a collaboration between the University of Maastricht and the Youth Harvest Foundation, followed by reporting of research results in relevant political environments by the Youth Harvest Foundation in association with the Swedish Association for Sexuality Education. The focus was on promoting CSE in schools in Ghana. In implementing the project, an approach focused on building trust and partnerships was used to broaden support for CSE’s content and also navigate political and cultural sensitivities regarding sexuality education (Entry Points Stage 1). This was done by shifting the focus from ‘human rights’ speeches to a strategic use of public health language to highlight its importance. Multi-stakeholder engagement was used to garner support and identify regional partners that would continue to support the programme (Entry Points Stages 4 and 5) [13, 14].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s).
PY - 2018/12/17
Y1 - 2018/12/17
N2 - Background: The uptake of findings from sexual and reproductive health and rights research into policy-making remains a complex and non-linear process. Different models of research utilisation and guidelines to maximise this in policy-making exist, however, challenges still remain for researchers to improve uptake of their research findings and for policy-makers to use research evidence in their work. Methods: A participatory workshop with researchers was organised in November 2017 by the Academic Network for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Policy (ANSER) to address this gap. ANSER is a consortium of experienced researchers, some of whom have policy-making experience, working on sexual and reproductive health and rights issues across 16 countries and 5 continents. The experiential learning cycle was used to guide the workshop discussions based on case studies and to encourage participants to focus on key lessons learned. Workshop findings were thematically analysed using specific stages from Hanney et al.'s (Health Res Policy Syst 1:2, 2003) framework on the place of policy-making in the stages of assessment of research utilisation and outcomes. Results: The workshop identified key strategies for translating research into policy, including joint agenda-setting between researchers and policy-makers, as well as building trust and partnerships with different stakeholders. These were linked to stages within Hanney et al.'s framework as opportunities for engaging with policy-makers to ensure uptake of research findings. Conclusion: The engagement of stakeholders during the research development and implementation phases, especially at strategic moments, has a positive impact on uptake of research findings. The strategies and stages described in this paper can be applied to improve utilisation of research findings into policy development and implementation globally.
AB - Background: The uptake of findings from sexual and reproductive health and rights research into policy-making remains a complex and non-linear process. Different models of research utilisation and guidelines to maximise this in policy-making exist, however, challenges still remain for researchers to improve uptake of their research findings and for policy-makers to use research evidence in their work. Methods: A participatory workshop with researchers was organised in November 2017 by the Academic Network for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Policy (ANSER) to address this gap. ANSER is a consortium of experienced researchers, some of whom have policy-making experience, working on sexual and reproductive health and rights issues across 16 countries and 5 continents. The experiential learning cycle was used to guide the workshop discussions based on case studies and to encourage participants to focus on key lessons learned. Workshop findings were thematically analysed using specific stages from Hanney et al.'s (Health Res Policy Syst 1:2, 2003) framework on the place of policy-making in the stages of assessment of research utilisation and outcomes. Results: The workshop identified key strategies for translating research into policy, including joint agenda-setting between researchers and policy-makers, as well as building trust and partnerships with different stakeholders. These were linked to stages within Hanney et al.'s framework as opportunities for engaging with policy-makers to ensure uptake of research findings. Conclusion: The engagement of stakeholders during the research development and implementation phases, especially at strategic moments, has a positive impact on uptake of research findings. The strategies and stages described in this paper can be applied to improve utilisation of research findings into policy development and implementation globally.
KW - ANSER
KW - global health
KW - health policy
KW - research
KW - Sexual and reproductive health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058660790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7
DO - 10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 30558612
AN - SCOPUS:85058660790
SN - 1478-4505
VL - 16
JO - Health Research Policy and Systems
JF - Health Research Policy and Systems
IS - 1
M1 - 123
ER -