Performance of the American Heart Association 14-point evaluation versus electrocardiography for the cardiovascular screening of university's volleyball teams players in Latvia

Toms Jānis Eglītis, Kalvis Kaļva, Sofija Ļebedeva, Anna Zuša, Baiba Norīte-Lapsiņa, Andris Vāvere, Jānis Zidens, Oskars Kalējs

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractpeer-review

Abstract

The objective was to perform cardiovascular screening for volleyball teams of universities in Latvia and compare the American Heart Association (AHA) 14-point evaluation and resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) methods. A prospective study was where volleyball athletes from universities of Latvia participated in cardiovascular screening using the AHA 14-point evaluation method and a resting 12-lead ECG. Research takes place from November 2019 till March 2020 in each university sports club facility. Collected data were analyzed with SPSS 23 using descriptive and inferential statistic methods (binary classification test). 154 athletes participated in this research. 21 (13.6%) athletes needed further evaluation after resting 12-lead ECG screening. 100 (64.9%) athletes were found to have at least one physiological change in their resting 12-lead ECG. The most frequent physiological change was left ventricular hypertrophy - 66 (42.9%) athletes, incomplete right bundle branch block - 49 (31.8%) athletes, resting bradycardia - 34 (22,1%) athletes. Abnormal ECG findings were found for 11 (7.1%) athletes, most frequent were T wave inversion for 8 (5.2%), long QT interval for 2 (1.3%) athletes, and premature ventricular contractions for 2 (1.3%) athletes. Borderline ECG findings were found for 24 (15.6%) athletes, from which 4 (2.6%) had 2 borderline findings and 6 (3.9%) had cardiovascular symptoms or have a positive family history of inherited cardiac disease or sudden cardiac death. 121 (78.5%) volleyball players answered positively to at least one question in the AHA 14-point evaluation survey. The sensitivity of the AHA 14-point evaluation compared to resting 12-lead ECG with abnormal findings was 90.5% (69.7%-98.8% (CI95%)), specificity – 24.8% (17.7%-33% (CI95%)) The AHA 14-point evaluation has high sensitivity but low specificity compared to resting 12-lead ECG with abnormal findings, which lead to many false-positive results. Further research is needed to find a more specific question-based screening method for the Latvian athlete population.
Original languageEnglish
Pages145
Publication statusPublished - 24 Mar 2021
Externally publishedYes
EventRSU Research week 2021: Knowledge for Use in Practice - Rīga, Latvia
Duration: 24 Mar 202126 Mar 2021
https://rw2021.rsu.lv/conferences/knowledge-use-practice

Conference

ConferenceRSU Research week 2021: Knowledge for Use in Practice
Abbreviated titleRW2021
Country/TerritoryLatvia
CityRīga
Period24/03/2126/03/21
Internet address

Field of Science

  • 3.2 Clinical medicine

Publication Type

  • 3.4. Other publications in conference proceedings (including local)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance of the American Heart Association 14-point evaluation versus electrocardiography for the cardiovascular screening of university's volleyball teams players in Latvia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this