TY - JOUR
T1 - Planning of stroke care and urgent prehospital care across Europe
T2 - Results of the ESO/ESMINT/EAN/SAFE Survey
AU - on Behalf of The ESO/ESMINT/EAN/SAFE Survey on Stroke Care Collaborators†
AU - Abilleira, Sònia
AU - de Sousa, Diana Aguiar
AU - Gattringer, Thomas
AU - Kobayashi, Adam
AU - Fazekas, Franz
AU - Szikora, Istvan
AU - Feigin, Valery
AU - Caso, Valeria
AU - Gallofré, Miquel
AU - Fischer, Urs
AU - Miglāne, Evija
AU - Kupčs, Kārlis
AU - Ķikule, Ilga
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: SA is co-PI of the RACECAT trial. VC received grants and speaker fees from BI. UF is consultant for Stryker, Medtronic and CSL Behring; Research grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Heart Foundation and Medtronic. DAS, TG, FF, AK, IZ, MG and VF have no disclosures.
Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to all ?ESO/ESMINT/EAN/SAFE Survey on Stroke Care in Europe? collaborators. We are also in debt to Bo Norrving, Didier Leys, Kennedy Lees and Turgut Tatlisumak for their useful comments regarding the questionnaire, data collection methodology and policy implications of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© European Stroke Organisation 2019.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - Introduction: Adequate planning and implementation of stroke systems of care is key to guarantee a rapid healthcare response and delivery of specific reperfusion therapies among candidates. We assessed the availability of stroke care plans in Europe, and evaluated their impact on rates of reperfusion therapies for stroke. Patients: Based on the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT), the European Academy of Neurology (EAN), and the Stroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE) survey, we analysed specific prespecified items in the questionnaire regarding availability and adequacy of stroke care plans, organised prehospital care and their potential impact on rates of delivery of reperfusion therapies for stroke at the country level. Results: Of 44 participating European countries, 37 have stroke care plans that operate at national and/or regional levels. Most stroke care plans take responsibility for the organisation/implementation of stroke systems of care (86%), quality of care assessment (77%), and act as a liaison between emergency medical systems and stroke physicians (79%). As for stroke systems of care, the focus is mainly on prehospital and in-hospital acute stroke care (Code Stroke systems available in 37/44 countries). Preferred urgent transport is via non-medicalised ambulances (70%). Presence of stroke care plans, stroke registry data, transport of urgent stroke patients via non-medicalised ambulances, and drip-and-ship routing of acute patients showed higher reperfusion treatment rates. Discussion: Availability of stroke care plans, still absent in some European countries, as well as some features of the stroke systems of care are associated with higher reperfusion treatment rates. Conclusion: Stroke is not yet a priority everywhere in Europe, which is a barrier to the spread of reperfusion therapies for stroke.
AB - Introduction: Adequate planning and implementation of stroke systems of care is key to guarantee a rapid healthcare response and delivery of specific reperfusion therapies among candidates. We assessed the availability of stroke care plans in Europe, and evaluated their impact on rates of reperfusion therapies for stroke. Patients: Based on the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT), the European Academy of Neurology (EAN), and the Stroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE) survey, we analysed specific prespecified items in the questionnaire regarding availability and adequacy of stroke care plans, organised prehospital care and their potential impact on rates of delivery of reperfusion therapies for stroke at the country level. Results: Of 44 participating European countries, 37 have stroke care plans that operate at national and/or regional levels. Most stroke care plans take responsibility for the organisation/implementation of stroke systems of care (86%), quality of care assessment (77%), and act as a liaison between emergency medical systems and stroke physicians (79%). As for stroke systems of care, the focus is mainly on prehospital and in-hospital acute stroke care (Code Stroke systems available in 37/44 countries). Preferred urgent transport is via non-medicalised ambulances (70%). Presence of stroke care plans, stroke registry data, transport of urgent stroke patients via non-medicalised ambulances, and drip-and-ship routing of acute patients showed higher reperfusion treatment rates. Discussion: Availability of stroke care plans, still absent in some European countries, as well as some features of the stroke systems of care are associated with higher reperfusion treatment rates. Conclusion: Stroke is not yet a priority everywhere in Europe, which is a barrier to the spread of reperfusion therapies for stroke.
KW - intravenous thrombolysis
KW - mechanical thrombectomy
KW - prehospital care
KW - quality of care
KW - Stroke
KW - systems of care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063333176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2396987319837106
DO - 10.1177/2396987319837106
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85063333176
SN - 2396-9873
VL - 4
SP - 329
EP - 336
JO - European Stroke Journal
JF - European Stroke Journal
IS - 4
ER -