The aim is to study the possibilities of the court to evaluate the information obtained in operational activities, to identify legal and practical problems in this, also put forward proposals for solutions. Analysis and description of regulatory enactments, scientific literature, expert surveys. Comparable and logical methods are used. Methods of interpretation of legal norms are used in the work: grammatical, systemic and teleological method. As a result of the research, it has been confirmed that in cases when information obtained during operative activities is to be assessed as evidence, the judge has limited possibilities to assess this evidence. During the research, it was concluded that amendments to regulatory enactments would always allow to evaluate the mentioned evidence.
- 3.4. Other publications in conference proceedings (including local)