Possible Procedural Solutions for Securing a Claim in Latvia: Comparison with the Experience of Lithuania, Estonia and the Russian Federation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Rakstā tiek analizēts prasības nodrošinājuma regulējums atsevišķās valstīs Eiropas Savienībā (Lietuvā, Igaunijā) un ārpus tās (Krievijā), salīdzinot prasības nodrošinājuma procesuālos risinājumus ar Latvijā spēkā esošo prasības nodrošinājuma tiesisko regulējumu, tādējādi izkristalizējot procesuālos problēmjautājumus un norādot uz nepieciešamību izdarīt grozījumus Latvijas Civilprocesa likumā [1]. The article analyses the regulation in some European Union countries (Lithuania, Estonia) and outside it (Russia), comparing procedural solutions of securing a claim with the legal regulation of securing a claim in Latvia, thus crystallizing procedural issues and pointing to the necessary amendments to the Civil Procedure Law of Latvia.
Translated title of the contributionPossible Procedural Solutions for Securing a Claim in Latvia: Comparison with the Experience of Lithuania, Estonia and the Russian Federation
Original languageLatvian
Pages (from-to)49-63
Number of pages15
JournalSocrates
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • civil procedure
  • insolvency process
  • procedural economy
  • securing a claim

Field of Science

  • 5.5 Law

Publication Type

  • 1.2. Scientific article included in INT1 or INT2 category journal of ERIH database

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Possible Procedural Solutions for Securing a Claim in Latvia: Comparison with the Experience of Lithuania, Estonia and the Russian Federation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this