TY - CONF
T1 - Predictors of Poor Long-Term Outcomes after Successful Thrombectomy in Large Vessel Acute Ischemic Stroke
AU - Radziņa, Maija
AU - Balodis, Arturs
AU - Šamanskis, Roberts
AU - Grabovska, Dagnija
AU - Bušs, Arvīds
AU - Jurjāns, Kristaps
AU - Solodjankina, Anastasija
AU - Grosmane, Arta
AU - Miglāne, Evija
AU - Kupčs, Kārlis
PY - 2025/3/28
Y1 - 2025/3/28
N2 - Objectives*Despite advancements in modern endovascular treatment, the burden of poor outcomes in acute ischemicstroke patients remains high even after successful endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). In this study, we at-tempted to identify the potential predictors of such outcomes in hospitalized ischemic stroke patients.Materials and Methods404 ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT at Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, Riga, from 2015 toAugust 2024 were selected based on successful EVT TICI scores (2b and 3). Long-term outcomes were assessedat 90 days after the procedure and identified as good (mRS 0-3) or poor (mRS 4-6).ResultsThe following 11 factors were suggested for predictive univariate analysis of poor outcomes after EVT: time toneedle, wake-up stroke, NIHSS at admission, EVT procedure duration, number of EVT passes, use ofintravenous thrombolysis, as well as patient-specific factors such as age, gender, platelet count, presence ofdiabetes mellitus and hypertension.Significant predictors identified in poor vs. good outcomes were:• Time to needle(TTN) (median 280min [IQR 210-359] vs. 240min [IQR 192-300]; p<0.001);• NIHSS at admission (median 18 [IQR 14-20] vs. 14 [IQR 9-17]; p<0.001);• EVT procedure duration (median 40min [IQR 24-59] vs. 30min [IQR 20-45]; p<0.001);• Number of EVT passes (1 vs. >3;p<0.001);• Age (median 75y vs.72y;p=0.003).Most significant predictors of poor outcomes (Se 69.5%, Sp 72.4%, AUC 0.766):• NIHSS at admission (OR=1.180 per point; p<0.001, 95%CI 1.118-1.246)• EVT procedure duration (OR=1.021 per minute; p=0.001, 95%CI 1.009-1.033)• Age (OR=1.033 per year; p=0.007, 95%CI 1.009-1.057)The logistic regression model achieved 71.0% classification accuracy, with a sensitivity of 69.5%, specificity of72.4%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.776.191ConclusionsPoor outcomes following EVT, despite successful recanalization, are independently associated with age, longerTTN and EVT procedure with more passes, higher NIHSS scores at admission. Recognizing these predictors canimprove the patient management approach.
AB - Objectives*Despite advancements in modern endovascular treatment, the burden of poor outcomes in acute ischemicstroke patients remains high even after successful endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). In this study, we at-tempted to identify the potential predictors of such outcomes in hospitalized ischemic stroke patients.Materials and Methods404 ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT at Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, Riga, from 2015 toAugust 2024 were selected based on successful EVT TICI scores (2b and 3). Long-term outcomes were assessedat 90 days after the procedure and identified as good (mRS 0-3) or poor (mRS 4-6).ResultsThe following 11 factors were suggested for predictive univariate analysis of poor outcomes after EVT: time toneedle, wake-up stroke, NIHSS at admission, EVT procedure duration, number of EVT passes, use ofintravenous thrombolysis, as well as patient-specific factors such as age, gender, platelet count, presence ofdiabetes mellitus and hypertension.Significant predictors identified in poor vs. good outcomes were:• Time to needle(TTN) (median 280min [IQR 210-359] vs. 240min [IQR 192-300]; p<0.001);• NIHSS at admission (median 18 [IQR 14-20] vs. 14 [IQR 9-17]; p<0.001);• EVT procedure duration (median 40min [IQR 24-59] vs. 30min [IQR 20-45]; p<0.001);• Number of EVT passes (1 vs. >3;p<0.001);• Age (median 75y vs.72y;p=0.003).Most significant predictors of poor outcomes (Se 69.5%, Sp 72.4%, AUC 0.766):• NIHSS at admission (OR=1.180 per point; p<0.001, 95%CI 1.118-1.246)• EVT procedure duration (OR=1.021 per minute; p=0.001, 95%CI 1.009-1.033)• Age (OR=1.033 per year; p=0.007, 95%CI 1.009-1.057)The logistic regression model achieved 71.0% classification accuracy, with a sensitivity of 69.5%, specificity of72.4%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.776.191ConclusionsPoor outcomes following EVT, despite successful recanalization, are independently associated with age, longerTTN and EVT procedure with more passes, higher NIHSS scores at admission. Recognizing these predictors canimprove the patient management approach.
KW - Successful Thrombectomy
KW - Large Vessel
KW - Acute Ischemic Stroke
KW - CT perfusion
M3 - Abstract
SP - 189
T2 - RSU Research Week 2025: Knowledge for Use in Practice
Y2 - 26 March 2025 through 28 March 2025
ER -