Primary law in medicine, its legal nature

Kristaps Zariņš

doi:10.1051/shsconf/20184001002

Primary law in medicine, its legal nature

Kristaps Zariņš

Rīga Stradiņš University

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The work will discuss the problems arising from the thesis that the economic opportunities are incompatible with the person’s primary law – the right to life and equality of treatment. An actively maintained hypothesis claims that the country’s economic opportunities and funding should not restrict or reduce a person’s right to life and health. In this aspect, it will also study the role of the constitutional court.
The author points to the fact that the adoption of such, here the Supreme Court decision, successive constitutional court for a preliminary inaccurate claim and interpretation of the country’s economic interests, could deny the right of people to life only after the consideration that they are of no use and financially expensive to be maintained.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	SHS Web of Conferences
Subtitle of host publication	6th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE
Editors	Uldis Berķis, Lolita Vilka
Publisher	EDP Sciences
Number of pages	11
Volume	40
ISBN (Electronic)	978-2-7598-9029-3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184001002
Publication status	Published - 2018
Event	6th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference "Society. Health. Welfare": Living in the World of Diversity: Social Transformations. Innovations. Solutions - Riga, Latvia Duration: 23 Nov 2016 → 25 Nov 2016 Conference number: 6

Publication series

Name	SHS Web of Conferences
ISSN (Print)	2261-2424

Conference

Conference	6th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference "Society. Health. Welfare"
Country/Territory	Latvia
City	Riga
Period	23/11/16 → 25/11/16

Keywords*

fundamental rights
survival
legal reliance
health financing
the right to life
social rights
emergency assistance
availability of resources
life dogma
primary law
rights of the child
healthy and sick persons

Field of Science*

5.5 Law

Publication Type*

3.1. Articles or chapters in proceedings/scientific books indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1051/shsconf/20184001002Licence: CC BY

Primary law in medicineFinal published version, 427 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@inproceedings{2620763330d84f15be2ab72468cfe2bb,

title = "Primary law in medicine, its legal nature",

abstract = "The work will discuss the problems arising from the thesis that the economic opportunities are incompatible with the person{\textquoteright}s primary law – the right to life and equality of treatment. An actively maintained hypothesis claims that the country{\textquoteright}s economic opportunities and funding should not restrict or reduce a person{\textquoteright}s right to life and health. In this aspect, it will also study the role of the constitutional court.The author points to the fact that the adoption of such, here the Supreme Court decision, successive constitutional court for a preliminary inaccurate claim and interpretation of the country{\textquoteright}s economic interests, could deny the right of people to life only after the consideration that they are of no use and financially expensive to be maintained.",

keywords = "fundamental rights, survival, legal reliance, health financing, the right to life, social rights, emergency assistance, availability of resources, life dogma, primary law, rights of the child, healthy and sick persons",

author = "Kristaps Zariņ{\v s}",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.1051/shsconf/20184001002",

language = "English",

volume = "40",

series = "SHS Web of Conferences",

publisher = "EDP Sciences",

editor = "Uldis Berķis and Vilka, {Lolita }",

booktitle = "SHS Web of Conferences",

address = "France",

note = "6th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference {"}Society. Health. Welfare{"} : Living in the World of Diversity: Social Transformations. Innovations. Solutions ; Conference date: 23-11-2016 Through 25-11-2016",

}

Zariņš, K 2018, Primary law in medicine, its legal nature. in U Berķis & L Vilka (eds), SHS Web of Conferences: 6th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE . vol. 40, 01002, SHS Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 6th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference "Society. Health. Welfare", Riga, Latvia, 23/11/16. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184001002

Primary law in medicine, its legal nature. / Zariņš, Kristaps.
SHS Web of Conferences: 6th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE . ed. / Uldis Berķis; Lolita Vilka. Vol. 40 EDP Sciences, 2018. 01002 (SHS Web of Conferences).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Primary law in medicine, its legal nature

AU - Zariņš, Kristaps

N1 - Conference code: 6

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The work will discuss the problems arising from the thesis that the economic opportunities are incompatible with the person’s primary law – the right to life and equality of treatment. An actively maintained hypothesis claims that the country’s economic opportunities and funding should not restrict or reduce a person’s right to life and health. In this aspect, it will also study the role of the constitutional court.The author points to the fact that the adoption of such, here the Supreme Court decision, successive constitutional court for a preliminary inaccurate claim and interpretation of the country’s economic interests, could deny the right of people to life only after the consideration that they are of no use and financially expensive to be maintained.

AB - The work will discuss the problems arising from the thesis that the economic opportunities are incompatible with the person’s primary law – the right to life and equality of treatment. An actively maintained hypothesis claims that the country’s economic opportunities and funding should not restrict or reduce a person’s right to life and health. In this aspect, it will also study the role of the constitutional court.The author points to the fact that the adoption of such, here the Supreme Court decision, successive constitutional court for a preliminary inaccurate claim and interpretation of the country’s economic interests, could deny the right of people to life only after the consideration that they are of no use and financially expensive to be maintained.

KW - fundamental rights

KW - survival

KW - legal reliance

KW - health financing

KW - the right to life

KW - social rights

KW - emergency assistance

KW - availability of resources

KW - life dogma

KW - primary law

KW - rights of the child

KW - healthy and sick persons

UR - https://www-webofscience-com.db.rsu.lv/wos/alldb/full-record/WOS:000431844300002

U2 - 10.1051/shsconf/20184001002

DO - 10.1051/shsconf/20184001002

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 40

T3 - SHS Web of Conferences

BT - SHS Web of Conferences

A2 - Berķis, Uldis

A2 - Vilka, Lolita

PB - EDP Sciences

T2 - 6th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference "Society. Health. Welfare"

Y2 - 23 November 2016 through 25 November 2016

ER -

Primary law in medicine, its legal nature

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords*

Field of Science*

Publication Type*

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this