Abstract
The global response to the coronavirus has highlighted gaping holes in the social security net. Resultantly, the unconditional basic income (UBI) idea has gained traction worldwide throughout 2020, both among the public and politicians looking for solutions to address poverty and stimulate economic recovery. The shift from viewing the UBI as a utopia towards recognizing it as an internationally acceptable policy requires further exploration. By comparing the pandemic-sparked interventionist policies on both sides of the Atlantic, the paper analyses the de facto introduction of the UBI in socially progressive countries, taking Canada and the Baltics as test cases. The authors conclude that the global crisis, exposing the alarming state of affairs of social security, has reopened an intense debate over the role of government interventions and the scope of the welfare state and paved the way for reforms that would embrace better state funding, with an emphasis on social solidarity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3-22 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Journal Global Policy and Governance |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Keywords*
- EU
- Interventionism
- Pandemic
- Poverty
- UBI
- Wealth
- Welfare state
Field of Science*
- 5.2 Economy and Business
Publication Type*
- 1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database