Pacienta autonomijas un integritātes aizsardzība tiesību aktos

Aldis Lieljuksis

doi:10.25143/socr.18.2020.3.028-042

Pacienta autonomijas un integritātes aizsardzība tiesību aktos

Translated title of the contribution: Protection of Patient Autonomy and Integrity in Law

Aldis Lieljuksis

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Several European countries, for instance, Poland, Portugal and Liechtenstein,
provide for criminal liability not only for harm to a patient in healthcare but also for
treatment without the patient’s consent in situations where it was necessary because of
an unlawful violation of fundamental rights. The study was conducted to find out which
legal norms of Chapter VIII of the Satversme (the Constitution) of the Republic of Latvia
guarantee autonomy and integrity of a person, as an integral value of fundamental human
rights, as well as the patient’s informed consent as the patient’s main means of ensuring these protected interests. Whether the protection of these interests is sufficiently effective or should also be provided for in a separate provision of the Criminal Law will be
clarified in another study

Translated title of the contribution	Protection of Patient Autonomy and Integrity in Law
Original language	Latvian
Pages (from-to)	28-42
Journal	Socrates
Volume	18
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.18.2020.3.028-042
Publication status	Published - 2020

Keywords*

Satversme (the Constitution),
Constitutional Court
informed consent

Field of Science*

5.5 Law

Publication Type*

1.2. Scientific article included in INT1 or INT2 category journal of ERIH database

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.25143/socr.18.2020.3.028-042Licence: CC BY-NC

Pacienta autonomijas un integritātesFinal published version, 268 KBLicence: CC BY-NC

https://dspace.rsu.lv/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2861/1/Socrates-18_03_Lieljuksis-Aldis_028-042.pdf

Cite this

@article{1b31d278b6a54400aa426400e1406f69,

title = "Pacienta autonomijas un integritātes aizsardzība tiesību aktos",

abstract = "Several European countries, for instance, Poland, Portugal and Liechtenstein,provide for criminal liability not only for harm to a patient in healthcare but also fortreatment without the patient{\textquoteright}s consent in situations where it was necessary because ofan unlawful violation of fundamental rights. The study was conducted to find out whichlegal norms of Chapter VIII of the Satversme (the Constitution) of the Republic of Latviaguarantee autonomy and integrity of a person, as an integral value of fundamental humanrights, as well as the patient{\textquoteright}s informed consent as the patient{\textquoteright}s main means of ensuring these protected interests. Whether the protection of these interests is sufficiently effective or should also be provided for in a separate provision of the Criminal Law will beclarified in another study",

keywords = "Satversme (the Constitution),, Constitutional Court, informed consent",

author = "Aldis Lieljuksis",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.25143/socr.18.2020.3.028-042",

language = "Latvian",

volume = "18",

pages = "28--42",

journal = "Socrates",

issn = "2256-0548",

publisher = "Rīga Stradiņ{\v s} University",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pacienta autonomijas un integritātes aizsardzība tiesību aktos

AU - Lieljuksis, Aldis

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Several European countries, for instance, Poland, Portugal and Liechtenstein,provide for criminal liability not only for harm to a patient in healthcare but also fortreatment without the patient’s consent in situations where it was necessary because ofan unlawful violation of fundamental rights. The study was conducted to find out whichlegal norms of Chapter VIII of the Satversme (the Constitution) of the Republic of Latviaguarantee autonomy and integrity of a person, as an integral value of fundamental humanrights, as well as the patient’s informed consent as the patient’s main means of ensuring these protected interests. Whether the protection of these interests is sufficiently effective or should also be provided for in a separate provision of the Criminal Law will beclarified in another study

AB - Several European countries, for instance, Poland, Portugal and Liechtenstein,provide for criminal liability not only for harm to a patient in healthcare but also fortreatment without the patient’s consent in situations where it was necessary because ofan unlawful violation of fundamental rights. The study was conducted to find out whichlegal norms of Chapter VIII of the Satversme (the Constitution) of the Republic of Latviaguarantee autonomy and integrity of a person, as an integral value of fundamental humanrights, as well as the patient’s informed consent as the patient’s main means of ensuring these protected interests. Whether the protection of these interests is sufficiently effective or should also be provided for in a separate provision of the Criminal Law will beclarified in another study

KW - Satversme (the Constitution),

KW - Constitutional Court

KW - informed consent

U2 - 10.25143/socr.18.2020.3.028-042

DO - 10.25143/socr.18.2020.3.028-042

M3 - Article

SN - 2256-0548

VL - 18

SP - 28

EP - 42

JO - Socrates

JF - Socrates

IS - 3

ER -

Pacienta autonomijas un integritātes aizsardzība tiesību aktos

Abstract

Keywords*

Field of Science*

Publication Type*

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this