Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quality of care at childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium: A cross-sectional study based on WHO standards

  • Anna Galle (Corresponding Author)
  • , Helga Berghman
  • , Silke D'Hauwers
  • , Nele Vaerewijck
  • , Emanuelle Pessa Valente
  • , Ilaria Mariani
  • , Arianna Bomben
  • , Stefano Delle Vedove
  • , Marzia Lazzerini
  • , IMAgiNE EURO Study Group
  • , Elizabete Pumpure (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Dace Rezeberga (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Dārta Jakovicka (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Gita Jansone-Šantare (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Anna Šibalova (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Elīna Voitehoviča (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Dārta Krēsliņa (Member of the Working Group)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: To examine quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around childbirth in facilities in Belgium during the COVID-19 pandemic and trends over time. 

Design: A cross-sectional observational study. 

Setting: Data of the Improving MAternal Newborn carE in the EURO region study in Belgium. 

Participants: Women giving birth in a Belgian facility from 1 March 2020 to 1 May 2023 responded a validated online questionnaire based on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures organised in four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of resources and organisational changes related to COVID-19. 

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Quantile regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of QMNC; trends over time were tested with the Mann-Kendall test. 

Results: 897 women were included in the analysis, 67% (n=601) with spontaneous vaginal birth, 13.3% (n=119) with instrumental vaginal birth (IVB) and 19.7% (n=177) with caesarean section. We found overall high QMNC scores (median index scores>75) but also specific gaps in all domains of QMNC. On provision of care, 21.0% (n=166) of women who experienced labour reported inadequate pain relief, 64.7% (n=74) of women with an instrumental birth reported fundal pressure and 72.3% (n=86) reported that forceps or vacuum cup was used without their consent. On experience of care, 31.1% (n=279) reported unclear communication, 32.9% (n=295) reported that they were not involved in choices,11.5% (n=104) stated not being treated with dignity and 8.1% (n=73) experienced abuse. Related to resources, almost half of the women reported an inadequate number of healthcare professionals (46.2%, n=414). Multivariable analyses showed significantly lower QMNC scores for women with an IVB (-20.4 in the 50th percentile with p<0.001 and 95% CI (-25.2 to -15.5)). Over time, there was a significant increase in QMNC Score for € experience of care' and € key organisational changes due to COVID-19' (trend test p< 0.05). 

Conclusions and relevance: Our study showed several gaps in QMNC in Belgium, underlying causes of these gaps should be explored to design appropriate interventions and policies. 

Trial registration number: NCT04847336.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere086937
JournalBMJ Open
Volume14
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Dec 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords*

  • Maternal medicine
  • Midwifery
  • Public Health
  • Quality in health care

Field of Science*

  • 3.2 Clinical medicine
  • 3.3 Health sciences

Publication Type*

  • 1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of care at childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium: A cross-sectional study based on WHO standards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this