TY - JOUR
T1 - Relative effectiveness of the second booster COVID-19 vaccines against laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers
T2 - VEBIS HCW VE cohort study (1 October 2022-2 May 2023)
AU - Savulescu, Camelia
AU - Prats-Uribe, Albert
AU - Brolin, Kim
AU - Uusküla, Anneli
AU - Bergin, Colm
AU - Fleming, Catherine
AU - Zvirbulis, Viesturs
AU - Zavadska, Dace
AU - Szułdrzyński, Konstanty
AU - Gaio, Vânia
AU - Popescu, Corneliu Petru
AU - Craiu, Mihai
AU - Cisneros, Maria
AU - Latorre-Millán, Miriam
AU - Lohur, Liis
AU - McGrath, Jonathan
AU - Ferguson, Lauren
AU - Abolina, Ilze
AU - Gravele, Dagne
AU - Machado, Ausenda
AU - Florescu, Simin Aysel
AU - Lazar, Mihaela
AU - Subirats, Pilar
AU - Clusa Cuesta, Laura
AU - Sui, Jacklyn
AU - Kenny, Claire
AU - Krievins, Dainis
AU - Barzdina, Elza Anna
AU - Melo, Aryse
AU - Kosa, Alma Gabriela
AU - Miron, Victor Daniel
AU - Muñoz-Almagro, Carmen
AU - Milagro, Ana María
AU - Bacci, Sabrina
AU - Kramarz, Piotr
AU - Nardone, Anthony
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2025/1/25
Y1 - 2025/1/25
N2 - Introduction: Repeated COVID-19 booster vaccination was recommended in healthcare workers (HCWs) to maintain protection. We measured the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of the second booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine compared to the first booster, against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in HCWs. Methods: In a prospective cohort study among HCWs from 12 European hospitals, we collected nasopharyngeal or saliva samples at enrolment and during weekly/fortnightly follow-up between October 2022 and May 2023. We estimated rVE of the second versus first COVID-19 vaccine booster dose against SARS-CoV-2 infection, overall, by time since second booster and restricted to the bivalent vaccines only. Using Cox regression, we calculated the rVE as (1-hazard ratio)*100, adjusting for hospital, age, sex, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and at least one underlying condition. Results: Among the 979 included HCWs eligible for a second booster vaccination, 392 (40 %) received it and 192 (20 %) presented an infection during the study period. The rVE of the second versus first booster dose was −5 % (95 %CI: −46; 25) overall, 3 % (−46; 36) in the 7–89 days after receiving the second booster dose. The rVE was 11 % (−43; 45) when restricted to the use of bivalent vaccines only. Conclusion: The bivalent COVID-19 could have reduced the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs by 11 %. However, we note the limitation of imprecise rVE estimates due to the proportion of monovalent vaccine used in the study, the small sample size and the study being conducted during the predominant circulation of XBB.1.5 sub-lineage. COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies in HCWs can provide important evidence to inform the optimal timing and the use of updated COVID-19 vaccines.
AB - Introduction: Repeated COVID-19 booster vaccination was recommended in healthcare workers (HCWs) to maintain protection. We measured the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of the second booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine compared to the first booster, against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in HCWs. Methods: In a prospective cohort study among HCWs from 12 European hospitals, we collected nasopharyngeal or saliva samples at enrolment and during weekly/fortnightly follow-up between October 2022 and May 2023. We estimated rVE of the second versus first COVID-19 vaccine booster dose against SARS-CoV-2 infection, overall, by time since second booster and restricted to the bivalent vaccines only. Using Cox regression, we calculated the rVE as (1-hazard ratio)*100, adjusting for hospital, age, sex, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and at least one underlying condition. Results: Among the 979 included HCWs eligible for a second booster vaccination, 392 (40 %) received it and 192 (20 %) presented an infection during the study period. The rVE of the second versus first booster dose was −5 % (95 %CI: −46; 25) overall, 3 % (−46; 36) in the 7–89 days after receiving the second booster dose. The rVE was 11 % (−43; 45) when restricted to the use of bivalent vaccines only. Conclusion: The bivalent COVID-19 could have reduced the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs by 11 %. However, we note the limitation of imprecise rVE estimates due to the proportion of monovalent vaccine used in the study, the small sample size and the study being conducted during the predominant circulation of XBB.1.5 sub-lineage. COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies in HCWs can provide important evidence to inform the optimal timing and the use of updated COVID-19 vaccines.
KW - COVID-19
KW - COVID-19 vaccines
KW - Europe
KW - Healthcare workers
KW - SARS-CoV-2
KW - Vaccine effectiveness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213037825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126615
DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126615
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85213037825
SN - 0264-410X
VL - 45
JO - Vaccine
JF - Vaccine
M1 - 126615
ER -