TY - JOUR
T1 - Reproducibility of colposcopy quality indicators - A survey among members of the European Federation for Colposcopy
AU - Randrup, Tina Hovgaard
AU - Leeson, Simon
AU - Ciavattini, Andrea
AU - Eldib, Ahmed
AU - Grigore, Mihaela
AU - van Haaften-de Jong, Anne Marie
AU - Jariene, Kristina
AU - Kesic, Vesna
AU - Koiss, Róbert
AU - Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura
AU - Quaas, Jens
AU - Raud, Terje
AU - Žodžika, Jana
AU - Hammer, Anne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Introduction: Colposcopy is an important part of the diagnostic work-up of women with an abnormal cervical screening test as it is used to guide the collection of biopsies. Although quality assurance has been used in the evaluation of screening programs, not much is known about quality indicators for the diagnostics and treatment of screen-positive women. Therefore, the European Federation for Colposcopy developed quality indicators aiming to support colposcopy practice across Europe. We performed a survey of colposcopy cases to determine if the quality indicators are understandable, relevant, and reproducible. Material and Methods: We conducted a survey among all members of the European Federation for Colposcopy Quality and Standards Group from November 2022 to March 2023. Members were asked to collect information on a total of 17 quality indicators for 50 women who had been newly referred for colposcopy due to an abnormal screening test between January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021. Results were reported descriptively. Results: We included data on 609 cases from 12 members across Europe. The majority of the quality indicators were either achieved or within reach of the agreed standard, often due to few countries with outlying data. One quality indicator had very low performance, although stratified results indicated that two countries had different clinical management of the patient type thereby skewing the results. In addition, discrepancies between the number of cases included in each quality indicator raised concerns regarding potential misunderstanding of the quality indicator and its objective. Conclusions: Quality indicators on colposcopy must be understandable to those collecting data, highlighting the importance of validating quality indicators before data collection.
AB - Introduction: Colposcopy is an important part of the diagnostic work-up of women with an abnormal cervical screening test as it is used to guide the collection of biopsies. Although quality assurance has been used in the evaluation of screening programs, not much is known about quality indicators for the diagnostics and treatment of screen-positive women. Therefore, the European Federation for Colposcopy developed quality indicators aiming to support colposcopy practice across Europe. We performed a survey of colposcopy cases to determine if the quality indicators are understandable, relevant, and reproducible. Material and Methods: We conducted a survey among all members of the European Federation for Colposcopy Quality and Standards Group from November 2022 to March 2023. Members were asked to collect information on a total of 17 quality indicators for 50 women who had been newly referred for colposcopy due to an abnormal screening test between January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021. Results were reported descriptively. Results: We included data on 609 cases from 12 members across Europe. The majority of the quality indicators were either achieved or within reach of the agreed standard, often due to few countries with outlying data. One quality indicator had very low performance, although stratified results indicated that two countries had different clinical management of the patient type thereby skewing the results. In addition, discrepancies between the number of cases included in each quality indicator raised concerns regarding potential misunderstanding of the quality indicator and its objective. Conclusions: Quality indicators on colposcopy must be understandable to those collecting data, highlighting the importance of validating quality indicators before data collection.
KW - cervical cancer prevention
KW - cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
KW - colposcopy
KW - health care
KW - quality assurance
KW - quality indicators
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196706438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/6a6b247d-0519-3f42-9fbd-bdc4346d2204/
U2 - 10.1111/aogs.14895
DO - 10.1111/aogs.14895
M3 - Article
C2 - 38922851
AN - SCOPUS:85196706438
SN - 0001-6349
VL - 103
SP - 1745
EP - 1752
JO - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
JF - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
IS - 9
ER -