Abstract
Background: Transarterial embolization (TAE) is an alternative procedure to repeat endoscopy or surgical intervention in the case of rebleeding after primary endoscopic treatment. The aim of the study was to assess the Rockall score as a criterion for TAE in the case of re-bleeding after endoscopic treatment of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB).
Methods: Out of the 673 patients who underwent emergent endoscopic hemostasis due to NVUGIB, 111 had a high risk of re-bleeding having a Forrest I-IIb ulcer and the Rockall score >= 5. From 111 patients, 37 accepted preventive TAE (PE+ group). The control group consisted of 74 patients who underwent standard treatment (PE-group).
Results: There were no differences in the demographic status between both groups, nor in the main clinical data on admission. The performance of TAE resulted in a significantly lower re-bleeding rate (1 (4.8%) vs. 11 (33%), P = 0.018). No patient who underwent TAE with the Rockall score >= 7 required surgery, resulting in only one rebleeding episode (P = 0.004). Mortality reached 5% and 11% in the PE+ and PE-groups accordingly.
Conclusion: The Rockall score >= 7 could be a reliable predictor of re-bleeding after primary endoscopic hemostasis as one criterion for the selection of indications for preventive TAE.
Methods: Out of the 673 patients who underwent emergent endoscopic hemostasis due to NVUGIB, 111 had a high risk of re-bleeding having a Forrest I-IIb ulcer and the Rockall score >= 5. From 111 patients, 37 accepted preventive TAE (PE+ group). The control group consisted of 74 patients who underwent standard treatment (PE-group).
Results: There were no differences in the demographic status between both groups, nor in the main clinical data on admission. The performance of TAE resulted in a significantly lower re-bleeding rate (1 (4.8%) vs. 11 (33%), P = 0.018). No patient who underwent TAE with the Rockall score >= 7 required surgery, resulting in only one rebleeding episode (P = 0.004). Mortality reached 5% and 11% in the PE+ and PE-groups accordingly.
Conclusion: The Rockall score >= 7 could be a reliable predictor of re-bleeding after primary endoscopic hemostasis as one criterion for the selection of indications for preventive TAE.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 339-346 |
Journal | GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2017 |
Keywords*
- Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
- Preventive embolization
- Risk assessment
- Rockall score
Field of Science*
- 3.2 Clinical medicine
Publication Type*
- 1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database