Abstract
In the world's developed countries, demographic changes, such as aging societies and increased numbers of diabetes patients, have led to an increase in amputations (11), and it is believed that as society ages, the number of people who are older than 65 will face as much as two times more amputations [3].
Of great importance after the amputation of a lower limb is the selection and adaptation of prostheses that allow patients to move around, thus achieving rehabilitation goals much more quickly [5].
A 20090-study of the rehabilitation of people with lower limb amputations in Latvia found that among 183 patients, 50% use their prostheses actively for more than 6 hours a day, 30% did not use them at all or used them for less than 3 hours a day, and 20% used them for 3-6 hours a day.
The study included 173 patients with lower limb amputations who were evaluated in 2012 in relation with whether primary prosthesis should be provided.
Of 173 patients who were evaluated, only 109 received a decision on primary prostheses, while in 51 cases the process was delayed for 1–3 months, in 12 cases, it was decided that prostheses would not be purposeful.
More than 25% of those who followed the recommended treatment and rehabilitation programme to prepare the amputation stump, reduced contracture and enhanced physical working abilities were declared to be appropriate for further prostheses. This indicates serious shortcomings in medical treatments during the early post-amputation period.
Of great importance after the amputation of a lower limb is the selection and adaptation of prostheses that allow patients to move around, thus achieving rehabilitation goals much more quickly [5].
A 20090-study of the rehabilitation of people with lower limb amputations in Latvia found that among 183 patients, 50% use their prostheses actively for more than 6 hours a day, 30% did not use them at all or used them for less than 3 hours a day, and 20% used them for 3-6 hours a day.
The study included 173 patients with lower limb amputations who were evaluated in 2012 in relation with whether primary prosthesis should be provided.
Of 173 patients who were evaluated, only 109 received a decision on primary prostheses, while in 51 cases the process was delayed for 1–3 months, in 12 cases, it was decided that prostheses would not be purposeful.
More than 25% of those who followed the recommended treatment and rehabilitation programme to prepare the amputation stump, reduced contracture and enhanced physical working abilities were declared to be appropriate for further prostheses. This indicates serious shortcomings in medical treatments during the early post-amputation period.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | SHS Web of Conferences |
Subtitle of host publication | 5th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE |
Editors | Aivars Vētra, Lolita Vilka |
Publisher | EDP Sciences |
Volume | 30 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-2-7598-9007-1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Event | 5th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference "Society. Health. Welfare" - Riga, Latvia Duration: 26 Nov 2014 → 28 Nov 2014 Conference number: 5 |
Publication series
Name | SHS Web of Conferences |
---|---|
ISSN (Print) | 2261-2424 |
Conference
Conference | 5th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference "Society. Health. Welfare" |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Latvia |
City | Riga |
Period | 26/11/14 → 28/11/14 |
Field of Science*
- 3.3 Health sciences
Publication Type*
- 3.1. Articles or chapters in proceedings/scientific books indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database