TY - JOUR
T1 - The evidence for placental microbiome and its composition in healthy pregnancies
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Zakis, Davis R.
AU - Paulissen, Eva
AU - Kornete, Liga
AU - Kaan, A. M.(Marije)
AU - Nicu, Elena A.
AU - Zaura, Egija
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was financially supported by Research Institute of Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Objective: To assess the available scientific evidence regarding the placental microbial composition of a healthy pregnancy, the quality of this evidence, and the potential relation between placental and oral microbiome. Materials and methods: Data sources: MEDLINE and EMBASE up to August 1, 2019. Study eligibility criteria: Human subjects; healthy women; term deliveries; healthy normal birth weight; assessment of microorganisms (bacteria) in placental tissue; full research papers in English. The quality of the included studies was assessed by a modified Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Results: 57 studies passed the inclusion criteria. Of these, 33 had a high risk of quality bias (e.g., insufficient infection control, lack of negative controls, poor description of the healthy cases). The remaining 24 studies had a low (N = 12) to moderate (N = 12) risk of bias and were selected for in-depth analysis. Of these 24 studies, 22 reported microorganisms in placental tissues, where Lactobacillus (11 studies), Ureaplasma (7), Fusobacterium (7), Staphylococcus (7), Prevotella (6) and Streptococcus (6) were among the most frequently identified genera. Methylobacterium (4), Propionibacterium (3), Pseudomonas (3) and Escherichia (2), among others, although frequently reported in placental samples, were often reported as contaminants in studies that used negative controls. Conclusions: The results support the existence of a low biomass placental microbiota in healthy pregnancies. Some of the microbial taxa found in the placenta might have an oral origin. The high risk of quality bias for the majority of the included studies indicates that the results of individual papers should be interpreted with caution.
AB - Objective: To assess the available scientific evidence regarding the placental microbial composition of a healthy pregnancy, the quality of this evidence, and the potential relation between placental and oral microbiome. Materials and methods: Data sources: MEDLINE and EMBASE up to August 1, 2019. Study eligibility criteria: Human subjects; healthy women; term deliveries; healthy normal birth weight; assessment of microorganisms (bacteria) in placental tissue; full research papers in English. The quality of the included studies was assessed by a modified Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Results: 57 studies passed the inclusion criteria. Of these, 33 had a high risk of quality bias (e.g., insufficient infection control, lack of negative controls, poor description of the healthy cases). The remaining 24 studies had a low (N = 12) to moderate (N = 12) risk of bias and were selected for in-depth analysis. Of these 24 studies, 22 reported microorganisms in placental tissues, where Lactobacillus (11 studies), Ureaplasma (7), Fusobacterium (7), Staphylococcus (7), Prevotella (6) and Streptococcus (6) were among the most frequently identified genera. Methylobacterium (4), Propionibacterium (3), Pseudomonas (3) and Escherichia (2), among others, although frequently reported in placental samples, were often reported as contaminants in studies that used negative controls. Conclusions: The results support the existence of a low biomass placental microbiota in healthy pregnancies. Some of the microbial taxa found in the placenta might have an oral origin. The high risk of quality bias for the majority of the included studies indicates that the results of individual papers should be interpreted with caution.
KW - Microbiome
KW - Oral cavity
KW - Placenta
KW - Pregnancy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120795424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jri.2021.103455
DO - 10.1016/j.jri.2021.103455
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34883392
AN - SCOPUS:85120795424
SN - 0165-0378
VL - 149
JO - Journal of Reproductive Immunology
JF - Journal of Reproductive Immunology
M1 - 103455
ER -