The Impact of Different Ventilatory Strategies on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia

Rihards P Rocans (Coresponding Author), Agnese Ozoliņa, Denise Battaglini, Evita Bine, Janis V Birnbaums, Anastasija Tsarevskaya, Sintija Udre, Marija Aleksejeva, Biruta Mamaja, Paolo Pelosi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)


Introduction: The aim was to investigate the impact of different ventilator strategies (non-invasive ventilation (NIV); invasive MV with tracheal tube (TT) and with tracheostomy (TS) on outcomes (mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay) in patients with COVID-19. We also assessed the impact of timing of percutaneous tracheostomy and other risk factors on mortality. Methods: The retrospective cohort included 868 patients with severe COVID-19. Demographics, MV parameters and duration, and ICU mortality were collected. Results: MV was provided in 530 (61.1%) patients, divided into three groups: NIV (n = 139), TT (n = 313), and TS (n = 78). Prevalence of tracheostomy was 14.7%, and ICU mortality was 90.4%, 60.2%, and 30.2% in TT, TS, and NIV groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Tracheostomy increased the chances of survival and being discharged from ICU (OR 6.3, p < 0.001) despite prolonging ICU stay compared to the TT group (22.2 days vs. 10.7 days, p < 0.001) without differences in survival rates between early and late tracheostomy. Patients who only received invasive MV had higher odds of survival compared to those receiving NIV in ICU prior to invasive MV (OR 2.7, p = 0.001). The odds of death increased with age (OR 1.032, p < 0.001), obesity (1.58, p = 0.041), chronic renal disease (1.57, p = 0.019), sepsis (2.8, p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (1.7, p = 0.049), multiple organ dysfunction (3.2, p < 0.001), and ARDS (3.3, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Percutaneous tracheostomy compared to MV via TT significantly increased survival and the rate of discharge from ICU, without differences between early or late tracheostomy.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2710
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of clinical medicine
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 11 May 2022


  • Percutaneous tracheostomy, Tracheostomy, COVID-19, Intensive care
  • Covicd-19
  • intensive care

Field of Science*

  • 3.2 Clinical medicine

Publication Type*

  • 1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database


Dive into the research topics of 'The Impact of Different Ventilatory Strategies on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this