TY - JOUR
T1 - The influence of a deep learning tool on the performance of oral and maxillofacial radiologists in the detection of apical radiolucencies
AU - Hamdan, Manal H.
AU - Uribe, Sergio E.
AU - Tuzova, Lyudmila
AU - Tuzoff, Dmitry
AU - Badr, Zaid
AU - Mol, André
AU - Tyndall, Donald A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Institute of Radiology and the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/2/1
Y1 - 2025/2/1
N2 - Objectives: This study aimed to assess the impact of a deep learning model on oral radiologists' ability to detect periapical radiolucencies on periapical radiographs. The secondary objective was to conduct a regression analysis to evaluate the effects of years of experience, time to diagnose, and specialty. Methods: This study used an annotated dataset and a beta version of a deep learning model (Denti.AI). The testing subset comprised 68 intraoral periapical radiographs confirmed with cone-beam computed tomography for the presence/absence of apical radiolucencies. Four oral radiologists participated in a cross-over reading scenario, analysing the radiographs under 2 conditions: initially without AI assistance and later with AI predictions. The study evaluated reader performance using Alternative Free-Response Receiver Operating Characteristic - Area Under the Curve (AFROC-AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Receiver Operating Characteristic-Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) per case. It also assessed sensitivity per lesion. Regression analysis investigated how experience, time spent on images, and specialty influenced reader performance. Results: No statistically significant differences were found in AFROC-AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and ROC-AUC. Regression analysis identified factors influencing diagnostic outcomes: unaided reading significantly prolonged diagnostic time (β = 12, 95% CI, 11-13, P < 0.001), while radiologists' professional status was positively associated with diagnostic accuracy (β = 0.02, 95% CI, 0.00-0.04, P = 0.015). These findings underscore the impact of AI on diagnostic efficiency and the critical role of radiologists' experience in diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion: AI did not significantly enhance radiologists' overall diagnostic accuracy. However, it showed potential to enhance efficiency, particularly advantageous for non-expert clinicians. The expertise of radiologists remains vital for accuracy, underscoring the complementary role of AI in dental diagnostics.
AB - Objectives: This study aimed to assess the impact of a deep learning model on oral radiologists' ability to detect periapical radiolucencies on periapical radiographs. The secondary objective was to conduct a regression analysis to evaluate the effects of years of experience, time to diagnose, and specialty. Methods: This study used an annotated dataset and a beta version of a deep learning model (Denti.AI). The testing subset comprised 68 intraoral periapical radiographs confirmed with cone-beam computed tomography for the presence/absence of apical radiolucencies. Four oral radiologists participated in a cross-over reading scenario, analysing the radiographs under 2 conditions: initially without AI assistance and later with AI predictions. The study evaluated reader performance using Alternative Free-Response Receiver Operating Characteristic - Area Under the Curve (AFROC-AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Receiver Operating Characteristic-Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) per case. It also assessed sensitivity per lesion. Regression analysis investigated how experience, time spent on images, and specialty influenced reader performance. Results: No statistically significant differences were found in AFROC-AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and ROC-AUC. Regression analysis identified factors influencing diagnostic outcomes: unaided reading significantly prolonged diagnostic time (β = 12, 95% CI, 11-13, P < 0.001), while radiologists' professional status was positively associated with diagnostic accuracy (β = 0.02, 95% CI, 0.00-0.04, P = 0.015). These findings underscore the impact of AI on diagnostic efficiency and the critical role of radiologists' experience in diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion: AI did not significantly enhance radiologists' overall diagnostic accuracy. However, it showed potential to enhance efficiency, particularly advantageous for non-expert clinicians. The expertise of radiologists remains vital for accuracy, underscoring the complementary role of AI in dental diagnostics.
KW - apical lesions
KW - apical radiolucencies
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - computer vision
KW - cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)
KW - deep learning
KW - dentistry
KW - machine learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217015447&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/dmfr/twae054
DO - 10.1093/dmfr/twae054
M3 - Article
C2 - 39656660
AN - SCOPUS:85217015447
SN - 0250-832X
VL - 54
SP - 118
EP - 124
JO - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
JF - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
IS - 2
ER -