Abstract
What role do political parties play in Central Asian authoritarianism? Typically understood as being irrelevant, this article argues to the contrary that parties play an important role in the mosaic of authoritarian rule via the articulation of private interests. Examining Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan this study identifies two models of party interest articulation: a leveraging model where a party is utilized to protect the financial and political interests of elites; and a coordinating model where a party serves to integrate presidential assets. Neither model is uniform and party dynamics are dependent upon the specific nature of each personalist regime.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 375-387 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Problems of Post-Communism |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue number | 4-5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Sept 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Field of Science*
- 5.6 Political science
- 5.4 Sociology
Publication Type*
- 1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Role of Party Interest Articulation in the Personalist-Authoritarian Regimes of the Central Asian Republics of Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver