Abstract
Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms provides
for the right of everyone to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal
established by law. An important guarantee, such as the enforcement of a court judgment, is also
enshrined in human rights theory and practice, as unenforced judgments pose a threat to legal stability,
which is one of the fundamental basis for the sustainable development of society. The institute of law
of the securing a claim serves in cases where execution of the future judgment may be impossible or
made substantially more difficult. The aim of the research is to study the legal framework, which
determines the regulations of the securing a claim in Latvia in order to make proposals for
enhancement of the legal framework. The research deployed descriptive, analytical and deductiveinductive methods as well as the methods of interpretation of legal norms. Using these methods, legal
acts, views of legal scientists and case law were reviewed and analyzed, and subsequently conclusions
and recommendations were made. Analyzing the development of the securing a claim it can be
admitted that this institute of law in Latvia has problems as the application of the securing a claim in
court practice within the framework of limited adversarial and dispositivity principles, as well as
shortcomings in the theoretical foundations of the securing a claim which are based on the findings
of legal scientists of the last century. As a result of the research, the author drew the conclusions, that
Latvia does not make sufficient use of the long-standing successful procedural solutions for securing
a claim in others states, such as court mortgages, bank guarantee or mortgage of the plaintiff to secure
the defendant's losses, defendant's protection letter to protect against unjustified securing a claim, a
possibility to secure a claims which are not financial in nature and m
for the right of everyone to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal
established by law. An important guarantee, such as the enforcement of a court judgment, is also
enshrined in human rights theory and practice, as unenforced judgments pose a threat to legal stability,
which is one of the fundamental basis for the sustainable development of society. The institute of law
of the securing a claim serves in cases where execution of the future judgment may be impossible or
made substantially more difficult. The aim of the research is to study the legal framework, which
determines the regulations of the securing a claim in Latvia in order to make proposals for
enhancement of the legal framework. The research deployed descriptive, analytical and deductiveinductive methods as well as the methods of interpretation of legal norms. Using these methods, legal
acts, views of legal scientists and case law were reviewed and analyzed, and subsequently conclusions
and recommendations were made. Analyzing the development of the securing a claim it can be
admitted that this institute of law in Latvia has problems as the application of the securing a claim in
court practice within the framework of limited adversarial and dispositivity principles, as well as
shortcomings in the theoretical foundations of the securing a claim which are based on the findings
of legal scientists of the last century. As a result of the research, the author drew the conclusions, that
Latvia does not make sufficient use of the long-standing successful procedural solutions for securing
a claim in others states, such as court mortgages, bank guarantee or mortgage of the plaintiff to secure
the defendant's losses, defendant's protection letter to protect against unjustified securing a claim, a
possibility to secure a claims which are not financial in nature and m
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 281-290 |
Journal | EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords*
- civil proceeding
- legal stability
- securing a claim
- sustainable development of law
Field of Science*
- 5.5 Law
Publication Type*
- 1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database