TY - JOUR
T1 - The stability of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and vertical ramus osteotomy after bimaxillary correction of class III malocclusion
AU - Abeltins, Andris
AU - Jakobsone, Gundega
AU - Urtane, Ilga
AU - Bigestans, Andris
PY - 2011/12
Y1 - 2011/12
N2 - Introduction: The purpose of this retrospective cephalometric study was to compare the stability of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) with extra-oral vertical ramus osteotomy (VRO) after correction of class III malocclusion by means of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Methods: The sample comprised 51 consecutively treated patients, 38 females and 13 males, with a mean age of 19.1 years. All had a one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary advancement and mandibular setback. VRO was performed in 30 cases, and BSSO was performed in 21 cases. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before surgery, within 1 week of surgery and 1 year after surgery. Results: The mean forward movement of the maxilla was 5.6 mm in both groups (p < 0.001). The mean horizontal surgical change in the VRO group was 4.4 mm (p < 0.001), and in the BSSO group it was 5.4 mm (p < 0.001). In the VRO group, the horizontal relapse was 1.2 mm (p < 0.001), and in the BSSO group, it was 1.4 mm (p < 0.001). Conclusion: There was no difference in the stability between the BSSO and VRO groups. The average relapse in the whole sample was 26% of the surgical movement.
AB - Introduction: The purpose of this retrospective cephalometric study was to compare the stability of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) with extra-oral vertical ramus osteotomy (VRO) after correction of class III malocclusion by means of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Methods: The sample comprised 51 consecutively treated patients, 38 females and 13 males, with a mean age of 19.1 years. All had a one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary advancement and mandibular setback. VRO was performed in 30 cases, and BSSO was performed in 21 cases. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before surgery, within 1 week of surgery and 1 year after surgery. Results: The mean forward movement of the maxilla was 5.6 mm in both groups (p < 0.001). The mean horizontal surgical change in the VRO group was 4.4 mm (p < 0.001), and in the BSSO group it was 5.4 mm (p < 0.001). In the VRO group, the horizontal relapse was 1.2 mm (p < 0.001), and in the BSSO group, it was 1.4 mm (p < 0.001). Conclusion: There was no difference in the stability between the BSSO and VRO groups. The average relapse in the whole sample was 26% of the surgical movement.
KW - Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
KW - Bimaxillary surgery
KW - Stability
KW - Vertical ramus osteotomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80055044788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1010518211000047?token=7B3E56A454AD17BBF1628C0DB2532983C1C185524872B59B5E98E45ED914ED78BA77AC4B0746F3DFAB391D7E4A19432E&originRegion=eu-west-1&originCreation=20210714062054
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.01.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.01.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 21334219
AN - SCOPUS:80055044788
SN - 1010-5182
VL - 39
SP - 583
EP - 587
JO - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 8
ER -