The stability of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and vertical ramus osteotomy after bimaxillary correction of class III malocclusion

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    43 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Introduction: The purpose of this retrospective cephalometric study was to compare the stability of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) with extra-oral vertical ramus osteotomy (VRO) after correction of class III malocclusion by means of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Methods: The sample comprised 51 consecutively treated patients, 38 females and 13 males, with a mean age of 19.1 years. All had a one-piece Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary advancement and mandibular setback. VRO was performed in 30 cases, and BSSO was performed in 21 cases. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before surgery, within 1 week of surgery and 1 year after surgery. Results: The mean forward movement of the maxilla was 5.6 mm in both groups (p < 0.001). The mean horizontal surgical change in the VRO group was 4.4 mm (p < 0.001), and in the BSSO group it was 5.4 mm (p < 0.001). In the VRO group, the horizontal relapse was 1.2 mm (p < 0.001), and in the BSSO group, it was 1.4 mm (p < 0.001). Conclusion: There was no difference in the stability between the BSSO and VRO groups. The average relapse in the whole sample was 26% of the surgical movement.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)583-587
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
    Volume39
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

    Keywords*

    • Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    • Bimaxillary surgery
    • Stability
    • Vertical ramus osteotomy

    Field of Science*

    • 3.2 Clinical medicine

    Publication Type*

    • 1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The stability of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and vertical ramus osteotomy after bimaxillary correction of class III malocclusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this